Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Marriage and civil partnership discriminationSexual orientation discrimination

Legal Q&A: Sexual orientation

by Personnel Today 9 Dec 2003
by Personnel Today 9 Dec 2003

By Michael Bradshaw, associate, employment and pensions
unit, Charles Russell

Q An employee has complained that he is being verbally abused by other
staff on the basis that his son is gay. Is this covered by the new Equality
Regulations?

A The regulations came into force on 1 December 2003. They provide
protection in the workplace against all forms of discrimination based on sexual
orientation. They also expressly cover harassment, which also covers verbal
abuse. In this scenario, the worker is being harassed due to the sexual orientation
of a member of his family, and not on the basis of his own sexual orientation.

However, this is covered under the new regulations, which protect against
discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation, whether it is the
orientation of the victim, or in this case, someone else.

Q An employee has stated that we are discriminating on the grounds of
sexual orientation because our insurance benefits only extend to spouses. Do we
have to change the availability of these benefits?

A. The regulations expressly exclude the provision of benefits that
are dependent on marital status. Without this exclusion, it would amount to
unlawful discrimination.

Any benefits available to opposite sex partners that do not require them to
be married are not covered by the exception, and such provisions would be
discriminatory.

In the Queen’s Speech, the Government announced its intention to introduce
legislation for ‘civil partnerships’, which would give same sex couples rights
and obligations akin to those of married couples. This is expected to mean the
exception will be removed at some stage in the future, although there is no
timetable for this yet.

Q An employee has asked to take leave and change her working hours as she
and her female partner will be adopting a child. Are these rights available to
same sex couples, and can you ask for evidence of a relationship?

A Rights for same sex couples were included within the provisions on
paternity and adoption leave, as well as flexible working, all of which were introduced
from 6 April 2003.

These rights extend to ‘partners’, which expressly covers persons of the
same sex and those of different sexes, and who live with the mother or adopter
in an enduring family relationship, but are not a relative. This partner must
have the main responsibility (together with the mother or main adopter) for the
upbringing of the child.

Employers are not allowed to seek any evidence of a relationship or whether
the worker is in fact going to have responsibility for the child. The rights
are based on self-certification on the employee’s part and employers should not
investigate or enquire further about the private lives of their staff.

Q Can an employer expressly hire people of a particular orientation?

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

A The regulations do provide for recruitment based on sexual
orientation, but only where it can be shown to be a genuine occupational
requirement for the job position.

The particular sexual orientation must be a specific requirement of the job,
and not just a preference.

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Gatwick Express train drivers stage walkout
next post
Information Commission to ban blanket drugs test

You may also like

School’s bid to appeal Kristie Higgs ruling refused...

11 Jun 2025

US Supreme Court lowers burden of proof for...

6 Jun 2025

Consultation launched after Supreme Court ‘sex’ ruling

20 May 2025

Supreme Court ruling and EHRC latest: how should...

28 Apr 2025

Union branch wants rights for polyamorous people

9 Apr 2025

EDI should not stifle LGB rights in the...

4 Mar 2025

LGB Alliance launches Business Forum to ‘restore’ gay...

5 Feb 2025

Sharp rise in people identifying as gay and...

30 Jan 2025

President Trump’s DEI backlash: should HR be worried?

24 Jan 2025

Employers need role models to attract young LGBTQ+...

16 Oct 2024

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+