Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Case lawDisability discriminationLong CovidDisabilityLatest News

Long Covid: what tribunal’s disability ruling means for HR

by Richard Fox and Özlem Mehmet 23 Jun 2022
by Richard Fox and Özlem Mehmet 23 Jun 2022 Shutterstock
Shutterstock

Whether long Covid is a disability has been seen as a grey area. However, a recent tribunal ruling could be good news for employees who claim they have suffered discrimination because of their lingering Covid symptoms. Richard Fox and Özlem Mehmet explain what the ruling means.

This week, in Burke v Turning Point Scotland, the Scottish Employment Tribunal ruled that an individual suffering from long Covid was “disabled” for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010 and could therefore bring a disability discrimination claim against his former employer.

Although a first-instance decision, which is not binding on other tribunals, it will be interesting to see whether this ruling will result in a spike in tribunal claims brought by those who feel they have been treated unfairly as a result of having long Covid.

Facts of the case

The claimant, Mr Burke, was employed as a caretaker/security by Turning Point Scotland, a charity supporting those in need (including those with disabilities) for about 20 years.

Burke first contracted Covid in November 2020 and never returned to work. His initial Covid symptoms were very mild and flu-like, however, after the isolation period, he developed severe headaches and symptoms of fatigue. His symptoms meant he would:

  • need to lie down and rest from fatigue and exhaustion after waking, showering and dressing
  • be unable to perform household chores he was accustomed to helping out with, such as ironing, shopping and cooking meals
  • be unable to walk to his local shop to buy the newspaper (as he used to do)
  • have joint pain in his arms, legs and shoulders, together with a loss of appetite and inability to concentrate, and
  • have a disturbed sleep pattern.

Burke felt better on some days than others and this unpredictability also made him anxious. He obtained fit notes from his doctor throughout his absence (mainly after telephone consultations with his GP due to the restrictions on in-person consultations) citing “fatigue”, “after effects of long Covid” and “post viral fatigue syndrome”.

Long Covid

Long Covid: phased return ‘unlikely’ to help workers

EHRC: Not all long Covid cases amount to disability

How to support employees with long Covid

Two occupational health reports were obtained by Turning Point, one in April 2021 and the other in June 2021. Both reports concluded that it was “unlikely” that the disability provisions of the Equality Act 2010 would apply to Burke.

Burke was dismissed on grounds of ill health in August 2021, having exhausted his entitlement to sick pay around June 2021.

He brought a number of claims against Turning Point, including for disability discrimination. Turning Point sought to have the disability discrimination claim struck out on the basis that his condition did not constitute a “disability” under the Act. A preliminary hearing was held to determine this point.

Was Burke disabled under the Equality Act 2010?

There are certain conditions (such as cancer or HIV) which are automatically classified as a “disability” under the Act. Long Covid is not such a condition, so whether it amounts to a disability is based on whether it meets the legal definition of disability.

A person is deemed disabled under the Act if they suffer from a physical or mental impairment which has a substantial (i.e. more than minor or trivial) and long-term effect (has lasted or is likely to last at least 12 months) on their ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities.

In its judgment, the tribunal referred to the TUC’s report, Workers’ experience of long Covid and noted its finding that fatigue is the most common symptom of long Covid, although issues concerning concentration, joint pain, muscle pain and headaches were also mentioned. The report had also found that roughly 29% of respondents experienced symptoms for 12 months or more and that symptoms varied over time (becoming worse on some days than others).

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Applying the principles to Burke, the tribunal found that:

  • he had a physical impairment (long Covid/post-viral fatigue syndrome) and his fluctuating symptoms were consistent with the TUC report.
  • he was not exaggerating his symptoms,as Turning Point had suggested. There was no incentive for him to remain off work when he had exhausted sick pay and the fact that he had been employed for 20 years did not suggest that he was likely to be pretending to be unfit for work.
  • the fact that there was no particularisation of symptoms in some of the GP notes, due to the severe restrictions on face-to-face meetings with GPs at the time, did not mean that those symptoms did not exist. The essential diagnosis was “post viral fatigue syndrome” caused by Covid-19
  • his physical impairment had an adverse effect on his ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities, and
  • this effect was more than minor or trivial and long term because it “could well” be that it would last for a period of 12 months when viewed from the dismissal date, which was the last alleged discriminatory act.

Key take-aways for employers

  • Long Covid may amount to a disability, so employers should bear this in mind in their approach to employees suffering from this condition. However, it is not a condition that is automatically deemed to meet the definition of disability, so the sequential steps in determining this question should be followed.
  • Although each case will turn on its own facts, the principles laid out in this judgment would seem to apply in many cases involving long Covid. The factual matrix of this case was not particularly unusual.
  • Occupational health and other medical reports are helpful in understanding an individual’s diagnosis and prognosis but are not determinative of whether a person’s condition constitutes a disability. That is a legal question to be determined by the tribunal and, as in this case, tribunals will not be beholden to the views expressed by the medical professionals. Opinions as to disability expressed in medical reports should, therefore, be treated with caution.
  • Think about whether and, if so, what reasonable adjustments may be appropriate to help employees suffering from long Covid. This is difficult given the fact that we are still on a learning curve with regard to this condition and the wide variety of symptoms it may cause. However, it is now clear that long Covid is a genuine condition and employers will need to be sensitive to this. Keeping an open mind and engaging in dialogue with employees will be key.

HR business partner opportunities on Personnel Today


Browse more HR business partner jobs

Richard Fox and Özlem Mehmet

Richard Fox is a senior consultant and Özlem Mehmet is a professional support lawyer in the employment department at law firm Kingsley Napley LLP.

previous post
Brexit remains an ‘open wound’ for EU employees in the UK
next post
Health interventions seen as unimportant by employees: research

You may also like

Working days lost to asthma up 150% since...

4 Apr 2025

Five years on: how has work changed since...

12 Mar 2025

Long Covid costing UK plc billions in lost...

10 Dec 2024

Long Covid: How, slowly, I found solutions that...

2 Dec 2024

Pain the most common symptom of long Covid...

20 Sep 2024

Long Covid cognitive and psychiatric problems can last...

31 Jul 2024

Study makes case for sick pay rethink to...

11 Jul 2024

People with long Covid being failed by return-to-work...

15 Apr 2024

Long Covid leaves ‘tell-tale’ traces of inflammation in...

12 Apr 2024

Covid vaccinations do protect against heart failure and...

15 Mar 2024

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+