Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Employment lawEmployment tribunals

Taylor v XLN Telecom and others, EAT

by Personnel Today 11 May 2010
by Personnel Today 11 May 2010

The claimant, Mr Taylor, succeeded in his claim against his former employer for unlawful victimisation under the Race Relations Act 1976.


The employment tribunal (ET) decided not to award him compensation for injury to feelings, relying on earlier case law which held that an award in respect of injury to feelings had to result from knowledge that it was an act of discrimination which brought about a dismissal.


The ET found the claimant had been dismissed partly on perceived performance grounds and partly because he had brought a grievance and made an allegation of racial discrimination when doing so. The ET found the claimant had attributed any injured feelings, not to his knowledge of any act of victimisation, but to the employer’s failure to comply with the statutory grievance and disciplinary procedures.


The claimant’s appeal was allowed. The case law that the ET referred to was specifically concerned with an award for injury to feelings and had no application to a claim for injury to health (the claimant was diagnosed with depression, an injury to health). The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) noted there was a conceptual distinction between the two types of injury, but the rules of recoverable compensation in relation to each should not be different in the circumstances, particularly where there is a degree of overlap in the actual suffering/injury for which any employee may claim. There was no reason in principle for making an exception in the case of awards for injury to feelings in discrimination cases.


The EAT therefore held that, in principle, an injury to health such as depression was governed by the usual principles applying to personal injury compensation, in other words that a claimant recovers compensation for the damage caused to him by a wrongful act. The claimant should therefore be able to recover compensation for his depression, irrespective of what he knew or did not know about his former employer’s motivation in dismissing him.


Key points


An employee complaining of discrimination could recover compensation for injury to feelings as long as the injury was attributable to the discriminatory conduct – it is not necessary that the employee should know of, or even suspect, the employer’s discriminatory motivation.


Different rules should not govern the recoverability of compensation for injury to feelings and injury to health (personal injury).

 

Avatar
Personnel Today

previous post
Regional view: Liverpool
next post
Hung parliament and economic uncertainty stall employer expansion plans

You may also like

One in five employers planning ‘no jab no...

19 May 2022

BNP Paribas banker accused of ’emotional terrorism’ wins...

19 May 2022

Bald move: Tribunal was right in sex-related harassment...

17 May 2022

MP demands timeline on carer’s leave legislation

13 May 2022

Employment tribunal: use of word ‘bald’ can amount...

13 May 2022

Queen’s Speech: absence of employment bill leaves organisations...

10 May 2022

Queen’s Speech: Exclusivity contracts for low-paid workers to...

9 May 2022

MP seeks legal protections for employees undergoing fertility...

9 May 2022

Solicitor unfairly dismissed during cancer recovery awarded £17k

6 May 2022

PwC staff to benefit from extended summer hours...

5 May 2022
  • What it really means to be mentally fit PROMOTED | What is mental fitness...Read more
  • How music can help to ease anxiety at work PROMOTED | A lot has happened since March 2020, hasn’t it?...Read more
  • Why now is the time to plug the unhealthy gap PROMOTED | We’ve all heard the term ‘health is wealth’...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+