Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Case lawEmployment law

Time limits and grievances: HM Prison Service v Barua

by Eversheds HR Group 5 Dec 2006
by Eversheds HR Group 5 Dec 2006

HM Prison Service v Barua, EAT, 15 November 2006


Background


In February 2005, the Prison Service unilaterally reduced Mr Barua’s pay. He protested, without success, and on 25 April 2005, he gave written notice of his resignation, effective from 31 July 2005. On 27 June 2005, during his notice period, he submitted a grievance in writing. Seven months later, Barua brought tribunal claims for unfair constructive dismissal and unlawful deductions from wages.


One of the circumstances in which the normal time limit for bringing a claim is extended by three months is where the statutory grievance procedures (SGPs) apply, and the employee has submitted a written grievance “within the normal time limit” – the period within which a complaint must be presented. An unfair dismissal complaint, for example, must normally be brought “before the end of the period of three months beginning with the effective date of termination”.


The tribunal accepted that Barua’s claims were in time, based on the fact that the grievance lodged on 27 June entitled him to a three-month extension of time. The Prison Service appealed, arguing that, at the date of the grievance, time had not yet started to run in respect of Barua’s claims as his employment had not terminated and the series of alleged deductions from wages had not come to an end. The grievance was therefore not “within the normal time limit” of the claims.


Decision


The appeal was dismissed. The requirement for a grievance to be lodged within the normal time limit only meant that it should not be lodged after the expiry of that time limit. It would be unsatisfactory on policy grounds that an employee who submitted a grievance before time started to run should only have three months, rather than six, to bring their claim, since this would penalise staff who acted promptly in raising a grievance.


Comment


Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

If the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) had decided that a grievance presented before resignation in a constructive dismissal case did not trigger an extension of time, this would have discouraged employees from raising grievances at an early stage when there was still some hope of resolution – a result that would have been contrary to the whole purpose of the dispute resolution procedures.

Eversheds HR Group

previous post
Deadline passes for public sector employers to implement disability rights schemes
next post
Heyday confident it will win its judicial review of age regulations

You may also like

Consultation launched after Supreme Court ‘sex’ ruling

20 May 2025

Minister defends Employment Rights Bill at Acas conference

16 May 2025

CBI chair Soames accuses ministers of not listening...

16 May 2025

EHRC bows to pressure and extends gender consultation

15 May 2025

Contract cleaner loses EAT race discrimination appeal

14 May 2025

Construction workers win compensation claim against defunct employer

9 May 2025

Zero-hours workers’ rights to be extended from beyond...

8 May 2025

Employment tribunal backlog up 23% in a year

7 May 2025

Ministers urged to outlaw misuse of NDAs

7 May 2025

‘Unacceptable to question integrity’ of Supreme Court judgment

2 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+