Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Case law

What constitutes a business transfer?

by Personnel Today 23 Jan 2001
by Personnel Today 23 Jan 2001

Cheesman and others v R Brewer Contracts, unreported,
November 2000, EAT

In 1998, Brewer took over the contract to maintain
Teignbridge council’s rented properties from Onyx. Brewer did not take on any
of Onyx’s staff. No tangible or intangible assets passed directly from Onyx to
Brewer and none passed indirectly via the council.

Cheesman and his colleagues argued this was a Tupe transfer
and claimed unfair dismissal and redundancy pay. The tribunal held that there
had been no transfer.

On appeal, the EAT held that the tribunal failed to take
into account the existing (albeit uncertain) Tupe case law and the criteria
laid down by the European Court of Justice. It failed to look at things “in the
round” and omitted to consider all relevant facts relating to the transaction.
In particular, the tribunal had failed to determine whether the undertaking had
continued and retained its identity following the transaction, the approach
taken by the Court of Appeal in 1999 in ECM v Cox. The matter went back to
tribunal.

 

Disciplinary investigation was discriminatory

Virdi v The Commission of the Police of the Metropolis, EOR
Discrimination Digest No 45, Employment Tribunal

Virdi, an Asian police officer, was suspected of sending
racist hate mail to black colleagues and himself. A white female officer,
Bachelor, was also suspected and interviewed. Virdi, however, was covertly
taped at a meeting unrelated to the incident in case he made any admissions
about it. He was then arrested, his house searched and he was eventually
suspended from work. He subsequently brought a successful race discrimination
claim.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The tribunal found that Virdi had not sent the letters and,
taking Bachelor as the comparator, held that Virdi had been treated differently
and detrimentally. Unlike Bachelor he was not interviewed informally, there was
an attempt to entrap him in a taped interview, his house was searched and he
was arrested and suspended. Virdi was awarded a record £100,000 for injury to
feelings, £25,000 aggravated damages and almost £25,000 interest.

Note: Virdi was dismissed from the Metropolitan Police in
March and his unfair dismissal claim will be heard this year

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Tribunal cases continue to escalate
next post
HR caught in crossfire on staff consultation

You may also like

‘Unacceptable to question integrity’ of Supreme Court judgment

2 May 2025

Trans ex-judge to appeal Supreme Court biological sex...

29 Apr 2025

EHRC: Interim update on single-sex spaces draws criticism

28 Apr 2025

Opposition to Supreme Court sex ruling is ‘wishful...

22 Apr 2025

Supreme Court transgender ruling: ‘common sense’ or ‘incredibly...

17 Apr 2025

Supreme Court: legal definition of woman based on...

16 Apr 2025

Philip Green loses human rights case at ECHR

8 Apr 2025

Whistleblowing protections do not extend to external job...

4 Apr 2025

Court of Appeal hears Ryanair pilot’s worker status...

1 Apr 2025

Two cautionary tales: how to avoid constructive dismissal...

1 Apr 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+