Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Employment lawHR practiceDismissal

Workers back government move to phase out retirement age

by Daniel Thomas 29 Oct 2010
by Daniel Thomas 29 Oct 2010

Nearly half of the UK workforce backs the Government’s plans to phase out the default retirement age (DRA), according to new research from the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD).

In the survey of 2,000 workers, 44% said that they oppose the DRA, with just 25% supporting enforced retirement at 65.

Older workers are significantly more likely to oppose the DRA than younger workers, with nearly six in 10 (56%) of those aged 55 and older disagreeing with the legislation, compared to 35% of 18- to 24-year-olds.

The survey, which helped inform the CIPD response to the Government’s consultation on its plans to phase out the DRA by October 2011, also shows that 41% of employees plan to work beyond the state retirement age, compared with 29% who do not.

Among those employees planning to work beyond the state retirement age, financial reasons are cited by 72% of respondents. This is closely followed by people’s needs and aspirations to continue using their skills and experience (47%), benefitting from social interaction in the workplace (41%) and self-esteem (34%).

Dianah Worman, diversity adviser at the CIPD, said: “The survey results show support from UK workers for the action the Government is taking to phase out the DRA. Its removal will put employers in a strong position to access a wider pool of mature talent. It will build on the beneficial experiences of UK employers who have already abandoned compulsory retirement ages.”

There are “clear business benefits” to employing a workforce that is age-diverse and reflects organisations’ customer profiles, according to Worman.

“Employers that already operate without a formal retirement age report that older workers typically have a great rapport with customers, as well as a conscientious attitude and real enthusiasm for the job,” she said.

But Worman warned that employers will need to make sure their people management policies and practices are in “mint condition” to manage an increasingly age-diverse workforce.

“Effective and fair performance management across the whole workforce will be critical, as will inclusive and creative approaches to flexible working, to support businesses in meeting their goals,” she said.

“If employers drag their heels in getting to grips with an ageing population and the associated 21st-century people-management challenges, they will fall behind more progressive competitors in sustaining business performance.”








XpertHR FAQs on the abolition of the default retirement age



  • How will employers deal with retirement after the abolition of the default retirement age?
  • Will employers still be able to operate a compulsory retirement age after the abolition of the default retirement age?
  • Will anything replace the current statutory retirement procedure after the abolition of the default retirement age?

Avatar
Daniel Thomas

previous post
Compromise agreements and the Equality Act 2010
next post
PSL debates Collaborative Working with Government

You may also like

Top 10 HR questions November 2023: Holiday carry-over

4 Dec 2023

‘Heat of the moment’ case sent back to...

1 Dec 2023

Legal expert calls new holiday pay regulations ‘incoherent’

30 Nov 2023

What will it mean to be an HR...

28 Nov 2023

Train driver unfairly dismissed after tarantula prank

28 Nov 2023

Former Jaguar Land Rover employee awarded £148k for...

27 Nov 2023

Cruise giant accused of planning ‘fire and rehire’...

24 Nov 2023

Burges Salmon takes home 2023 Employment Law Firm...

21 Nov 2023

McDonald’s: How can employers prevent sexual harassment?

21 Nov 2023

Tesco equal pay test cases to move to...

17 Nov 2023

  • How to spot and tackle imposter syndrome in the workplace PROMOTED | Half of all UK adults...Read more
  • BetterMe for Business: How to Build Wellness Culture at Work PROMOTED | Ever encountered a...Read more
  • Global growth with simple HR compliance (webinar) WEBINAR | In an increasingly global marketplace...Read more
  • Talent acquisition: How AI can complement a ‘back to basics’ approach PROMOTED | Artificial intelligence is now...Read more
  • What will it mean to be an HR professional in 2024? (webinar) WEBINAR | As we approach 2024...Read more
  • HR Budget Planning for 2024: Preparing your People Strategy PROMOTED | As organisations continue to adapt...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2023

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2023 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+