Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Vexatious claimsCase lawEmployment law

Costs award in the tribunal: Richmond v Devon Doctors On Call

by Eversheds HR Group 21 Nov 2006
by Eversheds HR Group 21 Nov 2006

Richmond v Devon Doctors On Call, EAT, 2 August 2006


Background


Ms Richmond worked as a driver and was dismissed for gross misconduct. She lodged a number of tribunal claims, including unfair dismissal and disability discrimination. There were certain delays in Richmond’s conduct of the proceedings – for instance, a case management discussion was adjourned for her to obtain medical advice, and she also failed to comply with a number of the tribunal directions. Richmond withdrew her disability discrimination claim, and her other claims were dismissed by the tribunal. Devon Doctors On Call (DDC) successfully applied for costs.


Richmond’s case was inherently weak, and the fact the disability claim was never properly pursued – together with the failure to comply with the tribunal’s directions – demonstrated unreasonable conduct.


Although Richmond had obtained some work as a taxi driver, at around £230 a week, she was unemployed at the time of the hearing. Nevertheless, the tribunal ordered her to pay £4,000 towards DDC’s costs. Richmond appealed in relation to the issue of costs only.



Decision


The power to make an order for costs can be found in the Employment Tribunals Regulations 2004. These provide that a costs order may be made where the paying party (or their representatives) in bringing or conducting proceedings have acted vexatiously, abusively, disruptively or otherwise unreasonably, or the proceedings were misconceived.


Although the tribunal was not obliged to consider Richmond’s means, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that the tribunal gave insufficient reasons for its decision regarding costs, and it was unclear to what extent it considered Richmond’s means as relevant. It also had not given any adequate explanation as to why it had chosen the figure of £4,000.


The EAT sent the matter back to the original tribunal to determine whether it was appropriate to make a costs order for £4,000 or any other sum.



Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Comment


Despite the power of the employment tribunal to make an award of costs, generally, costs orders remain the exception rather than the rule. The Annual Report of the Employment Tribunals Service for 2005-06 shows that costs awards were made in just 0.5% of cases, with two-thirds of awards being made in favour of respondents. The average award was £1,136.

Eversheds HR Group

previous post
Mismanagement of the long-term sick is costing UK employers billions of pounds a year
next post
Company drivers at risk as employers fail to provide regular eye tests

You may also like

Bereavement leave to extend to miscarriages before 24...

7 Jul 2025

Company director wins £15k after being told to...

4 Jul 2025

How can HR prepare for changes to the...

3 Jul 2025

Government publishes ‘roadmap’ for Employment Rights Bill

2 Jul 2025

Employers’ duty of care: keeping workers safe in...

27 Jun 2025

When will the Employment Rights Bill become law?

26 Jun 2025

Seven ways to prepare now for the Employment...

20 Jun 2025

The employer strikes back: the rise of ‘quiet...

13 Jun 2025

Lawyers warn over impact of Employment Rights Bill...

13 Jun 2025

Racism claims have tripled and ‘Equality Act is...

12 Jun 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+