Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

PoliceEquality, diversity and inclusionLatest News

Gloucester police could face legal claims after discrimination payout

by Personnel Today 21 Mar 2006
by Personnel Today 21 Mar 2006

Gloucestershire Police could be the next force to face legal claims for positive discrimination in its recruitment practices, with failed applicants seeking legal advice and the local MP taking their case on, Personnel Today has learned.

Last week, Avon and Somerset Police paid out an undisclosed sum – thought to be in the region of £25,000 – to a male job applicant who was rejected because he was white. The force also scrapped its ‘positive action’ scheme, calling it “not appropriate”, and offered all failed applicants the chance to re-apply for a job.

The Avon and Somerset force rejected 186 white applicants because its workforce was “over-represented by white men”. It faces a bill of up to £4m if all those rejected on racial grounds come forward.

Now, Gloucestershire Police could face a similar bill if the 108 men who were “randomly deselected” from a recruitment drive bring claims. It was later revealed they were turned down in favour of ethnic minority candidates as the force struggled to hit diversity quotas set by the government.

One of the men rejected by Gloucestershire Police confirmed that he was talking to lawyers about a possible claim. “We have been to our MP and he is doing all he can, but I think it’s going to take legal action to put the real pressure on,” he told Personnel Today.
Parmjit Dhanda, the Labour MP for Gloucester, would not confirm how many other of his constituents had contacted him about the recruitment policy, as it was confidential.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

A spokeswoman from Gloucestershire Police said that no legal claims had yet been lodged against the force as a result of the recruitment campaign. She said the force could not comment further due to an ongoing investigation by the Commission for Racial Equality.

[email protected]


For more on the Somerset case, go to personneltoday.com/34352.article


Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Cumbria NHS trust to compensate under paid women workers by £60m
next post
Scottish council looks abroad for recruits to cover social work shortages

You may also like

Bank holidays: six things employers need to know

22 Aug 2025

Exec hauled over coals for sleeping in sauna...

22 Aug 2025

Lidl enters agreement with EHRC to prevent sexual...

22 Aug 2025

Workers need more protection from heatwaves, says WHO

22 Aug 2025

Immigration: huge fall in health and care worker...

22 Aug 2025

Government takes control of UK’s third largest steelworks

22 Aug 2025

X settles severance claims of former Twitter employees

22 Aug 2025

Space X scores court win against US National...

22 Aug 2025

Personnel Today Awards 2025 shortlist: Excellence in Public...

22 Aug 2025

Nature charity unfairly dismisses employee in ‘woeful’ process

22 Aug 2025

  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise