Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employment lawEmployment tribunals

Legal Q&A: Handling high-profile/sensitive tribunal claims

by Personnel Today 31 Jan 2006
by Personnel Today 31 Jan 2006

Can I prevent the press from reporting my case?

Sometimes, yes – but only in a very limited way. A tribunal can issue a Restricted Reporting Order, but it can only be used to protect individuals, not companies. The order prevents the press from identifying a person affected by the allegations or the person making the allegations. They are only made in cases involving allegations of sexual misconduct, or in disability discrimination cases where evidence of a personal nature is likely to be heard. Even where an order is made, it will only last until, at most, remedy and liability have been determined by the tribunal.

Our case involves witnesses giving evidence concerning some very sensitive and confidential information. Can I insist that the tribunal hearing is held in private?

A The tribunal can hold part or all of a hearing in private if:



  • a person is likely to give evidence which they cannot disclose without contravening legislation
  • the evidence has been communicated to the witness in confidence
  • the disclosure would cause substantial injury to the undertaking in which the witness works
  • there are national security issues involved.

However, the general presumption will always be that the public should have full access to
a hearing.

I have a number of documents that are relevant to the case, but they contain highly sensitive information. Can I simply refuse to disclose them on this basis?

No. You should raise the matter with the tribunal in advance of disclosure and let it know of your concerns. Generally, all evidence relevant to the facts in issue in a case must be disclosed to the other side. If the tribunal is satisfied that the disclosable information is sensitive (eg it may reveal the identity of a witness whose safety may be compromised, or a highly sensitive trade secret), it may allow you to disclose the document with the relevant information redacted (ie blanked out). If the relevant information cannot be hidden by redaction, it may be that some of the evidence has to be excluded from proceedings, and the tribunal will have to make a decision on that basis, although this will be very exceptional.
One of our witnesses is worried about press interest in the case. Can they give evidence in writing without having to appear before the tribunal?

Yes. Your witness can submit a written witness statement to the tribunal. Any written representations must be submitted to the tribunal at least seven days before the hearing. However, because the other side will not have the opportunity to cross-examine your witness, the tribunal may not give very much weight to their evidence. This might be fatal to your case if they are an important witness.

I am concerned that the claimant in this case is using the press to embarrass us to settle their claim. Should I use the press to retaliate?

Prior to the conclusion of a case, you run the risk of acting in contempt of the tribunal unless you are very careful about what you say. This can have very serious consequences for the individuals involved and for your case. Furthermore, you are never likely to be able to control what the press reports, and significant press attention is likely to result in added stress on your witnesses in advance of and during tribunal proceedings. 

I think the press will be interested in our case. Would you recommend taking advice from a PR?

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Yes, both in dealing with the media and in terms of what you say to your employees. A properly thought through and legally compliant response to the press as a case is heard is vital, as is your organisation’s response to the outcome (whatever that might be). It is important that PR people – whether your own internal people or external consultants – are kept up to speed at all times as to the progress of the case. This may not necessarily be the first thing that you think about when planning your case, but this approach is vital if media interest in your case is to be managed properly. You do not want to find yourself in a position where your opponents are managing your publicity for you.

Robin Jeffcott is partner and head of employment, and Michael Smith is associate, Richards Butler


Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Boys’ Brigade attacks Liberty and Law comment
next post
Computer virus set to attack on Friday

You may also like

Company director wins £15k after being told to...

4 Jul 2025

How can HR prepare for changes to the...

3 Jul 2025

Government publishes ‘roadmap’ for Employment Rights Bill

2 Jul 2025

Employers’ duty of care: keeping workers safe in...

27 Jun 2025

When will the Employment Rights Bill become law?

26 Jun 2025

HR manager with ‘messy’ work loses discrimination case

25 Jun 2025

Man who used company credit card for himself...

23 Jun 2025

Seven ways to prepare now for the Employment...

20 Jun 2025

AI company did not racially discriminate against Chinese...

20 Jun 2025

Barts nurse told to remove watermelon image claims...

19 Jun 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+