Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Latest News

Plans to combat spiralling tribunals will fail, says HR

by Personnel Today 19 Feb 2002
by Personnel Today 19 Feb 2002

Employers are concerned that government measures to curb the spiralling
number of employment tribunals will fail after the latest figures reveal
another big rise in tribunal applications.

Research by employment law firm Peninsula shows the number of employment
tribunal applications leapt 8.5 per cent in 2001 to 128,406 on top of a 15 per
cent increase the previous year.

The Employment Bill, which will come into force later this year, aims to cut
the tribunal caseload by introducing a range of measures, including: encouraged
use of internal disciplinary and grievance procedures and making all disputes
subject to a fixed period of conciliation.

But David Yeandle, deputy director of employment policy at the Engineering
Employers’ Federation, is concerned the Bill is too complex and will not cut
claims to employment tribunals

"Potentially, it’s more complicated for small employers – there are too
many variables. We need clarity in the legislation."

Yeandle said pending legislation – in particular, laws relating to age
discrimination – will create even more tribunal cases.

The Employers Forum on Statute and Practice, is not optimistic that the
measures outlined in the Employment Bill will have a significant impact on the
number of employment tribunals.

Chief executive Robbie Gilbert said: "People are becoming increasingly
litigious. They do seem to want their day in court.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

"The establishment of the Acas scheme last year, which was supposed to
offer a quick way of resolving disputes, has coincided with a determined effort
on the part of the tribunals to cut waiting times. Tribunals almost seem to be
marketing themselves as preferable."

Denise Walker, head of corporate personnel at Nationwide, supports plans in
the Employment Bill to promote in-house grievance procedures, but she fears the
Bill will produce "grey areas" and create problems due to its
complexity.

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
CPS devolves diversity to tackle institutional racism
next post
Employers not armed in ‘war for talent’

You may also like

FCA issues clarity on workplace savings schemes to...

27 Aug 2025

MoD worker loses harassment claim over lack of...

27 Aug 2025

Acas to explore use of AI as half...

27 Aug 2025

TUC calls for ‘step change’ as half worry...

27 Aug 2025

Poundland avoids collapse as restructure approved

27 Aug 2025

London hotel housekeepers call off strike action

27 Aug 2025

Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain...

27 Aug 2025

Indeed launches platform aimed at healthcare workers

27 Aug 2025

Café worker awarded £22k after being too cold...

26 Aug 2025

Royal Mail eCourier drivers bring legal claim over...

26 Aug 2025

  • Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain with centred ergonomics SPONSORED | If you often notice...Read more
  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise