Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Corporate manslaughterEmployment lawLatest News

Name and shame those guilty of corporate manslaughter

by Mike Berry 4 Mar 2008
by Mike Berry 4 Mar 2008

Companies that break the new Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act should be named and shamed and hit by big fines, according to the Institution of Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH).

Other sanctions – including far-reaching improvement orders and the suspension of board directors – should all be at the court’s disposal when sentencing under the new legislation, which comes into force on 6 April.

In its response to the Sentencing Advisory Council consultation on the sentencing for corporate manslaughter and homicide, IOSH has suggested wide-ranging remedial orders, including:

  • the compulsory training of directors and senior staff in the management of occupational safety and health
  • the introduction of a behavioural safety programme
  • the use of third-party audits and access to competent health and safety advice
  • the suspension of all or part of a board or governing body of a convicted organisation.

IOSH president Ray Hurst said: “Poor practices and behaviour patterns may have developed over several years and long-term commitment is required to bring about a reversal in this.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

“Some fairly radical measures may be needed, for example, where there have been extreme cases of collective senior management failure, the courts may consider it’s in the best interest of public and employee health and safety for all or part of the board to be suspended.”

IOSH has also agreed with the proposed range of fines up to and beyond 10% of annual turnover, depending on circumstances, and that there should be a minimum level of fine – suggesting 2.5% of annual turnover.




Mike Berry

previous post
Workplace pension is most important benefit offered by employers
next post
Agency workers

You may also like

Sickness absence soars to nearly two weeks per...

9 Sep 2025

Why do whistleblowing hotlines still matter?

9 Sep 2025

Reshuffle sparks fears over Employment Rights Bill

8 Sep 2025

Report calls for ban on barristers’ sexual relations...

8 Sep 2025

Jobcentres more about benefits than work, say MPs

8 Sep 2025

Pay awards feeling tightest squeeze since December 2021

8 Sep 2025

Employee who shopped online at work wins unfair...

8 Sep 2025

EHRC submits new code of practice to government

5 Sep 2025

Lloyds Banking Group to target underperformers for job...

5 Sep 2025

How to manage workplace investigations effectively

5 Sep 2025

  • Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain with centred ergonomics SPONSORED | If you often notice...Read more
  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits Live
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise