Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

MilitaryEquality, diversity and inclusionEqual pay

Armed Forces could be exempt from conducting equal pay audits

by Louisa Peacock 25 Jun 2009
by Louisa Peacock 25 Jun 2009

The Armed Forces would be exempt from proving it offered equal pay to its male and female employees, if the latest amendments to the Equality Bill succeeded.

In a long list of further tabled amendments to the Bill, Vera Baird, the solicitor general and person responsible for taking it through parliament, has requested that the Armed Forces and security and intelligence agencies be excluded from conducting equal pay audits.

Three Conservative MPs also listed a similar amendment.

The move would mean that thousands of UK military personnel would be exempt from rights to ensure their employer published information on the amount they paid women and men, currently listed as clause 73 in the Bill.

In Baird’s explanatory statement next to her amendment, she said: “This amendment would exclude the security and intelligence agencies and Government Communications Headquarters’s military helpers from the scope of clause 73. As a result, that clause would not apply to any [security/intelligence] government department or any part of the Armed Forces.”

The Equality Bill was introduced to help eradicate the equal pay gap, which currently stands at 17.1% for full-time roles.

A significant clause in the Bill will force employers with 250 employees or more to conduct equal pay audits by 2013 if they do not do so voluntarily. This could be reduced to employers with 100 staff or more, if another amendment tabled by Liberal Democrat equality spokeswoman Lynne Featherstone succeeded.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Featherstone also recently called for a clause to ensure that written job applications were nameless, so as to prevent discrimination taking place at the selection stage.

The Equality Bill is still in committee stage.

Louisa Peacock

previous post
Workplace deaths figure may be skewed by drop in workload and jobs
next post
Recruitment agencies: the fight for survival

You may also like

Aircrew with cancer pursuing MoD for compensation –...

2 Jul 2025

Living wage pushes up spring pay settlements

2 Jul 2025

Ethnicity and disability pay gaps: Ready to report?...

1 Jul 2025

One in eight senior NHS managers from black...

1 Jul 2025

Co-op equal pay claims move onto next stage

30 Jun 2025

Progressive DEI policy is a red line for...

27 Jun 2025

Richard Tice: ‘pathetic’ to put HR manager in...

26 Jun 2025

Graduate pay versus the living wage: an HR...

25 Jun 2025

BBC Breakfast bullying and misconduct allegations under investigation

20 Jun 2025

Finance professionals expect less emphasis on ESG and...

18 Jun 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+