Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

MilitaryEquality, diversity and inclusionEqual pay

Armed Forces could be exempt from conducting equal pay audits

by Louisa Peacock 25 Jun 2009
by Louisa Peacock 25 Jun 2009

The Armed Forces would be exempt from proving it offered equal pay to its male and female employees, if the latest amendments to the Equality Bill succeeded.

In a long list of further tabled amendments to the Bill, Vera Baird, the solicitor general and person responsible for taking it through parliament, has requested that the Armed Forces and security and intelligence agencies be excluded from conducting equal pay audits.

Three Conservative MPs also listed a similar amendment.

The move would mean that thousands of UK military personnel would be exempt from rights to ensure their employer published information on the amount they paid women and men, currently listed as clause 73 in the Bill.

In Baird’s explanatory statement next to her amendment, she said: “This amendment would exclude the security and intelligence agencies and Government Communications Headquarters’s military helpers from the scope of clause 73. As a result, that clause would not apply to any [security/intelligence] government department or any part of the Armed Forces.”

The Equality Bill was introduced to help eradicate the equal pay gap, which currently stands at 17.1% for full-time roles.

A significant clause in the Bill will force employers with 250 employees or more to conduct equal pay audits by 2013 if they do not do so voluntarily. This could be reduced to employers with 100 staff or more, if another amendment tabled by Liberal Democrat equality spokeswoman Lynne Featherstone succeeded.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Featherstone also recently called for a clause to ensure that written job applications were nameless, so as to prevent discrimination taking place at the selection stage.

The Equality Bill is still in committee stage.

Louisa Peacock

previous post
Workplace deaths figure may be skewed by drop in workload and jobs
next post
Recruitment agencies: the fight for survival

You may also like

Council defends suggested alternatives to ‘husband’ and ‘wife’

21 Aug 2025

Could equal pay questionnaires be revived?

19 Aug 2025

British Transport Police first force to hire part-time...

19 Aug 2025

Eurostar’s Georgie Willis a keynote speaker at Employee...

19 Aug 2025

RAF sergeant’s maternity discrimination claim upheld at EAT

13 Aug 2025

Worker awarded £3,000 for ‘Slave’ graffiti employer had...

7 Aug 2025

EU pay transparency rules driving ‘cultural pay shift’...

7 Aug 2025

Civil Service launches drive to attract interns from...

1 Aug 2025

Why LGBTQ+ is not one big, happy acronym

25 Jul 2025

MPs ‘openly hostile’ to preferred choice for EHRC...

24 Jul 2025

  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise