More clarity but no shortcuts with data protection: Johnson, an orthopaedic surgeon of some 20 years and of unblemished record,...
Case law
-
-
What constitutes less favourable treatment?: Webley commenced employment on a two-month fixed-term contract on 4 February 2002. She had a...
-
Holiday pay doubts roll on: The employees in these conjoined appeals all worked shifts. Their holiday pay was incorporated in...
-
‘Without prejudice’ is without meaning: Shortly after returning to work from maternity leave, Mezzotero raised a grievance complaining, among other...
-
No acceptance of employer’s breach by receipt of sick pay: Walker was appointed as Forbes’ line manager, resulting in Forbes...
-
Notification of policy change is essential: Having worked for the Inland Revenue since the age of 16, Scott was dismissed...
-
Stress review: In 1995, Barber, a teacher, was employed as a head of department in a school. Changes at the...
-
Backdated holidays: Farrar and Gray worked as self-employed consultants under contracts which did not provide for holiday pay. When their...
-
Maternity leave and pay: Alabaster commenced maternity leave in January 1996 and received higher rate statutory maternity pay (SMP) for...
-
Reading the small print: Sweeney, a sales executive, was employed on terms and conditions which stated that any sales commission...
-
Maternity leave is no holiday: This European Court of Justice (ECJ) decision deals with the interaction between a woman’s right to...
-
Workers’ economic well-being: Following a nervous breakdown, Crossley went on sick leave and never returned to work. He was entitled...
-
Worker, employee or neither?: Firthglow – a business engaged in applying textured coating to building exteriors – advertised for ‘workers’...
-
No more opportunities for loss of opportunity: Harper was summarily dismissed on 2 March 2001, 33 days short of the...
-
No duty of care when giving reasons for dismissal: Aspin – a sales director – was made redundant, and told...