Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Pay & benefitsPensions

Age regulations may force employers to make expensive pension scheme adjustments

by Georgina Fuller 20 Nov 2006
by Georgina Fuller 20 Nov 2006

The new age discrimination legislation could force employers to make costly rearrangements to their pension schemes, research has revealed.

Companies with defined contribution schemes that do not permit members to set their own target retirement age could be susceptible to legal claims, the study by Aon Consulting found.

Almost half (45%) of the 170 defined contribution pension schemes assessed by the HR consultancy did not allow members to choose their target retirement age.

Paul Macro, head of defined contribution at Aon Consulting, said: “Under new age discrimination legislation, not allowing scheme members the flexibility to set their own target retirement age could potentially be illegal. Companies need to think more about the impact of how this new legislation will impact on their pension schemes to ensure that they do not fall foul of this new legislation.”

Nine in 10 of the defined contribution schemes were found to offer at least one ‘investment lifestyle’ option – automatic processes that change a member’s investment options depending on their age. 

Macro said: “The offering of more than one lifestyle option reflects the growing realisation that one size does not fit all when it comes to pension schemes.  Variations around the level of risk that members are willing to take in the growth stage, and the different income options now available apart from buying an annuity, mean that multiple options have to be given.”

 

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

 

 

Georgina Fuller

previous post
RMT calls for Underground infrastructure work to be brought back in-house
next post
Transport and General Workers Union to launch drive for better wages for road transport staff

You may also like

Gender pension gap means women stop receiving pension...

21 Aug 2025

Employee Benefits Live 2025 conference programme unveiled

21 Aug 2025

Eurostar’s Georgie Willis a keynote speaker at Employee...

19 Aug 2025

Lidl to increase entry-level hourly pay for 35,000...

15 Aug 2025

Raise retirement in line with life expectancy, say...

11 Aug 2025

EU pay transparency rules driving ‘cultural pay shift’...

7 Aug 2025

Ministers vow to set living wage rate for...

5 Aug 2025

June sees strongest UK vacancy growth since summer...

28 Jul 2025

Pensions Commission launched to tackle low retirement savings

21 Jul 2025

Mansion House speech: will employers’ pension contributions rise?

15 Jul 2025

  • Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain with centred ergonomics SPONSORED | If you often notice...Read more
  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise