Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employment law

Avoid the pitfalls of work-life balance by considering flexible working requests seriously

by Personnel Today 16 May 2006
by Personnel Today 16 May 2006

The new buzzword giving HR practitioners a headache is ‘fambition’, which, stripped to its core, equates to dads wanting to spend more time at home with the children and less time at the office. But in seeking to reach this goal, men are now starting to exercise their statutory right to request flexible working as laid down in the Employment Rights Act 1996 and supporting regulations.

Rejection rates

Since the right to request flexible working was introduced, 10% of male employees have approached their employers about changing hours, according to a recent TUC report, Out of Time. However, UK managers have looked more favourably on female members of staff, with only 10% of working mothers having their requests rejected out of hand compared to 14% of men.

The range of family rights open to men is limited. Paternity leave is two weeks and must be taken in blocks. Also, it only attracts pay at the rate of 106 per week or 90% of average weekly earnings, whichever is the lower amount. Provisions in the forthcoming Work and Families Bill may slightly improve the situation, however, enabling fathers to take up to 26 weeks’ additional paternity leave (some of which could be paid) if the mother returns to work.

But it is the flexible working legislation that provides fathers with the best opportunity to become involved in family life. The legislation enables fathers with a child under six (or under 18 if the child is disabled) to make a request for flexible working, as long as they have worked for their employer continuously for 26 weeks at the time the application is made.

There is a strict procedure you must follow when considering an application. Failure to do so can lead to a tribunal or the arbitration service Acas awarding compensation (a maximum of eight weeks’ pay capped at the statutory limit of 290 per week) and insisting the application be reconsidered.

Flexible equality

More importantly, failure to agree to a request for flexible working, where a similar request has been granted to a female member of staff, may expose your organisation to a claim for sex discrimination – with uncapped compensation and tribunals having the power to make awards for injury to feelings.

In extreme circumstances, depending on the way a request for flexible working is dealt with, it could place a male employee in a position to bring a claim for constructive unfair dismissal.

Obviously, not all employers will be in a position to accommodate flexible working patterns. But if you reject a request, you must be able to justify it by establishing a business reason for rejection, with a clear explanation as to why the decision was reached.

Justification for rejecting a request may include:



  • the burden of extra costs

  • a detrimental effect on the organisation’s ability to meet customer demands

  • the inability to reorganise work among existing staff

  • the inability to recruit additional staff

  • a detrimental impact on quality/performance

  • insufficiency of work during the period the employee proposes to work

  • planned structural changes.

But do not use any of the above as a convenient tag to evade your responsibilities.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More men are asking if they can work flexibly. To ensure these individuals are not lost, employers will have to think more laterally about reallocating roles and responsibilities.

Key points



  • Paternity rights are due to be extended under the provisions of the Work and Families Bill in 2007.

  • Employers have a duty to deal with all requests for flexible working.

  • Requests for flexible working can be rejected on certain business grounds.

  • To defend any claims, employers should document their procedures and clearly explain why a request has been turned down.

  • Employers will be required to think more innovatively on how they structure their workforce – develop a policy on flexible working and review this regularly.

Turning down flexible working can constute a grievance note

Bosses unconvinced by male requests for flexible working

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Internal relations: How well do HR and payroll really get on?
next post
Bank of New York to administer BA’s pension payments

You may also like

Ministers loosen fire and rehire proposals in Employment...

10 Jul 2025

Court of Appeal rules that Ryanair agency pilot...

9 Jul 2025

Bereavement leave to extend to miscarriages before 24...

7 Jul 2025

Company director wins £15k after being told to...

4 Jul 2025

How can HR prepare for changes to the...

3 Jul 2025

Government publishes ‘roadmap’ for Employment Rights Bill

2 Jul 2025

Employers’ duty of care: keeping workers safe in...

27 Jun 2025

When will the Employment Rights Bill become law?

26 Jun 2025

Seven ways to prepare now for the Employment...

20 Jun 2025

The employer strikes back: the rise of ‘quiet...

13 Jun 2025

  • Empower and engage for the future: A revolution in talent development (webinar) WEBINAR | As organisations strive...Read more
  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+