Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employee-shareholdersIncentivesLegal opinionShare options

The benefits and challenges of employee share incentives

by John Dormer 20 Feb 2015
by John Dormer 20 Feb 2015 John Lewis is well known for being owned by its workfoce. Photo: Geoff Moore/REX
John Lewis is well known for being owned by its workfoce. Photo: Geoff Moore/REX

Recent academic research looking into the impact of employee share ownership provides some fairly compelling data to support arguments that companies offering employee share incentives are likely to outperform those that do not. John Dormer guides us through some of the options available.

Resources on employee share incentives

Introduce an employee share scheme

How to decide whether or not to make use of employee-shareholder status

Benefits to employers and employees

From an employee relations angle, providing share incentives could be a much more effective tie-in to the business than salary and bonuses, while also ensuring that long-term interests become aligned with you as a shareholder. Shares also reward employees for generating sustainable long-term growth in value, as opposed to achieving shorter-term targets.

In terms of retention, share incentives are growing significantly in popularity and profile and there may well be defensive reasons for offering key employees shares – in short, if you do not offer them, then would alternative employers be likely to do so?

With the Government’s stated aim of creating a “John Lewis economy”, the climate is as good as ever to look at employee share ownership. Recent government initiatives have made employee share schemes easier to implement in terms of the legal requirements, and are also more tax efficient for businesses and employees.

From a financial point of view, rewards to employees via shares under government-backed arrangements can be received tax free or with just 10% tax being payable by the employee. This contrasts very favourably with cash bonuses where up to 47% of any benefit can go straight to the taxman.

Coupled with tax savings to businesses, tax-efficient share incentives could provide up to £1.27 of reward to the employee for every £1 of cost to shareholders/the business. This significantly exceeds the return on cash bonuses that could be as low as just 46 pence for every £1 of cost.

Shareholder rights

Importantly, control can still be fully retained by existing shareholders by using share options or employee shares with little or no voting say. Any holding of shares/options by employees should also be subject to restrictions on transfer and forfeiture to ensure that the shares cannot be transferred outside of existing shareholder control and are also forfeit in the event that the employee leaves the business.

Some owner-managers are concerned about suffering dilution to their existing value in the business. Employee shares need not result in any economic dilution through the use of specific classes of shares, which allow the employee to benefit only in future growth – thus ring-fencing current value for existing shareholders.

Unlike cash bonuses, to ensure that employee share incentives are genuinely valued, there must be some prospect of the employee being able to “cash in” his or her shares. In many cases this is through a sale to a third party. For businesses that are unlikely to exit, internal market arrangements can be created, possibly involving the sale of shares back to shareholders/the company to enable the employee to realise the value in his or her shares.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Key to the success of any arrangement will be ensuring that the quantum and any targets attached to the incentives strike the right balance. The incentives themselves must be of a meaningful enough size and with sufficient potential upside to make them attractive to the employee. Appropriately designed performance targets would also be worth considering to ensure that performance and reward are properly linked and that shareholders get value out of the incentives too.

Share incentives can cause complications where these key issues are not properly addressed. With appropriate structuring, however, they can provide a genuine tie-in for employees and ultimately help generate greater overall equity value for business owners.

John Dormer

John Dormer is a partner at the law firm Wright Hassall.

previous post
Learning Technologies 2015: L&D has to “undo educational damage”
next post
Shared parental leave: how does your organisation compare?

You may also like

Opposition to Supreme Court sex ruling is ‘wishful...

22 Apr 2025

Higgs’ victory has ‘profound’ implications for employers

12 Feb 2025

McDonald’s: zero hours culture feeds sexual harassment allegations

10 Feb 2025

Employers branded bad gift-givers by nearly half of...

14 Nov 2024

Employee ownership rules to be toughened over tax...

31 Oct 2024

The sexual (harassment) revolution

22 Oct 2024

‘Hushed hybrid’: legal and commercial implications

15 Oct 2024

Boom in firms moving to employee ownership trust...

7 Oct 2024

Plan to ban unpaid internships: What it means...

27 Sep 2024

Changes to UK immigration present challenges for employers

24 Sep 2024

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+