Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employment lawTUPE

Case of the month: TUPE

by Personnel Today 3 Sep 2005
by Personnel Today 3 Sep 2005

TUPE: whether an employee was assigned to an undertaking

 Skillbase Services Limited v King

The Court of Session has decided that time spent working on a particular project is only one factor to consider in determining whether an employee was assigned to a project in a TUPE (Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations) transfer.

Skillbase had won a housing maintenance contract from Falkirk Council and supervised the contract through its Grangemouth branch. The housing maintenance contract accounted for 80% of the branch’s workload. Falkirk Council eventually decided to bring the contract in-house and terminate the contract with Skillbase. There was a dispute over whether three employees would transfer.

The tribunal found that Mr Small transferred as he spent all of his time dealing with the local repair teams in relation to the housing maintenance contract. Mr Gray transferred because he substantially did the same job as Small, although he only spent 80% of his time on the maintenance contract. However, Mr King did not transfer, even though he gave evidence that he was spending 80% of his time dealing with the council contract.

The tribunal focused on the fact that as the manager of the Grangemouth branch, King oversaw a number of contracts. He was not directly involved in the operational aspects of the housing contract on a daily basis, he was more of a figurehead. The tribunal decided that the significant proportion of time spent by King on the contract with the council was simply due to an increase in the proportion of branch turnover derived from that contract, and did not mean that he was ‘assigned’ to that contract for the purposes of TUPE.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The Court of Session dismissed the appeal, and upheld the decision of the employment tribunal.

No one factor will be decisive in deciding whether an employee has transferred to an undertaking under the provisions of TUPE.

The amount of time spent working on a contract alone is not decisive when assessing whether an employee is assigned to a transferring business.

What you should do



  • When deciding whether an employee is ‘assigned’ to a transferring business, do not focus solely on the time they spend on that business. Consider other factors, such as the relative importance/value of the work they perform on that business compared with other areas, the terms of their employment contract which show what they can be required to do, and the allocation of the cost of the employee’s time.
  • When purchasing a business or taking over a contract, request a list of transferring employees and request an indemnity from the seller in respect of any individual not on that list who transfers under TUPE.


Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Union accuses Gate Gourmet of reneging on deal
next post
A death sentence?

You may also like

Employers’ duty of care: keeping workers safe in...

27 Jun 2025

When will the Employment Rights Bill become law?

26 Jun 2025

Seven ways to prepare now for the Employment...

20 Jun 2025

The employer strikes back: the rise of ‘quiet...

13 Jun 2025

Lawyers warn over impact of Employment Rights Bill...

13 Jun 2025

Racism claims have tripled and ‘Equality Act is...

12 Jun 2025

Court rejects Liberty’s legal challenge against EHRC consultation

9 Jun 2025

US Supreme Court lowers burden of proof for...

6 Jun 2025

Institute of Directors demand reforms to Employment Rights...

6 Jun 2025

Employment Rights Bill: peers propose change to work...

4 Jun 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+