Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

BenefitsCase lawDepartment for Work and PensionsSexual orientation discriminationPensions

Civil partner pension benefits need not be equalised

by Jo Faragher 7 Oct 2015
by Jo Faragher 7 Oct 2015 John Birdsall/REX Shutterstock
John Birdsall/REX Shutterstock

Pension schemes will not be required to pay backdated benefits to civil partners of their members, due to a Court of Appeal ruling.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the case by John Walker, who argued that his former employer Innospec failed to treat surviving same-sex spouses and civil partners the same as widows or widowers in heterosexual marriages.

Civil partnership and pensions

Employment law manual: sexual orientation discrimination

Marriage and civil partnership discrimination

Employment law: Pensions

Walker retired from Innospec, a chemicals company, in 2003 after working for the company for 23 years. He wanted to ensure that his partner would be adequately provided for if he died first.

He claimed that, if he were to marry a woman, she would be entitled to around £41,000 per year, compared with his husband being entitled to receive around 1% of this amount.

The effect of this latest appeal is that pension schemes will not need to provide civil partners of pension scheme members with benefits in respect of service before 5 December 2005.

Walker made a successful tribunal claim for direct discrimination in 2013, but this went to the Employment Appeal Tribunal, when the Department for Work and Pensions argued that failing to backdate the contributions was not in contravention of EU law.

Following the EAT decision, the Government carried out a review of same-sex survivor benefits. It was estimated that the cost to pension schemes of equalising and backdating these benefits for same-sex marriages could be as much as £3 billion.

Alistair Meeks, pensions partner at Pinsent Masons, said: “Making retrospective changes to pension schemes is always fraught with difficulty.

“There are many points to consider – such as the impact of the extra cost on scheme funding or what to do about individuals who have paid additional contributions to purchase extra survivors’ benefits.”

The court admitted that Mr Walker would find the conclusion hard to accept, but said that “changes to social attitudes, and the legislation which embodies those changes, cannot fully undo the effects of the past”.

A number of employers have voluntarily chosen to equalise survivor benefits, treating civil partnerships exactly the same way as heterosexual marriages.

Earlier this year, TUC general-secretary Frances O’Grady said the Government’s refusal to legislate on same-sex survivor benefits was a “scandal”.

She said: “The Government must remove the last hurdle to equality under the law and bring an end to discrimination that could leave thousands of people in poverty at a time when they are grieving for a loved one.”

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Isabel Nurse-Marsh, head of pensions litigation at Pinsent Masons, added: “Many lawyers will not be surprised at the outcome of this appeal. It shows the courts unwilling to intervene and challenge the legality of exemptions to European discrimination law.”

“The EAT felt that the UK law was clear in allowing schemes not to equalise survivors’ benefits fully, and to ignore this would be to ‘legislate rather than interpret’. The Court of Appeal evidently agrees.”

Jo Faragher

Jo Faragher has been an employment and business journalist for 20 years. She regularly contributes to Personnel Today and writes features for a number of national business and membership magazines. Jo is also the author of 'Good Work, Great Technology', published in 2022 by Clink Street Publishing, charting the relationship between effective workplace technology and productive and happy employees. She won the Willis Towers Watson HR journalist of the year award in 2015 and has been highly commended twice.

previous post
Financial watchdogs announce new whistleblowing rules
next post
Repay as you earn: payroll borrowing to help employees’ finances

You may also like

How neuroscience can unlock employee recognition

22 May 2025

Consultation launched after Supreme Court ‘sex’ ruling

20 May 2025

EHRC bows to pressure and extends gender consultation

15 May 2025

TPT to launch multi-employer CDC pension scheme

12 May 2025

‘Unacceptable to question integrity’ of Supreme Court judgment

2 May 2025

Millions at risk of retiring under-pensioned

30 Apr 2025

Trans ex-judge to appeal Supreme Court biological sex...

29 Apr 2025

Supreme Court ruling and EHRC latest: how should...

28 Apr 2025

EHRC: Interim update on single-sex spaces draws criticism

28 Apr 2025

What will reward look like in 2035?

28 Apr 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+