Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Social mediaLatest NewsDiscipline

Turning up the heat on employees who tweet

by Kirsty Cooke 10 May 2019
by Kirsty Cooke 10 May 2019

In the aftermath of Danny Baker’s sacking from the BBC this week for tweeting what he later described was an “idiotic” joke about the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s new-born son, Kirsty Cooke investigates how employers should handle their employees’ use of social media.

Despite Radio 5 Live presenter Danny Baker’s apology for tweeting an image of a couple holding hands with a chimpanzee dressed in clothes with the caption “Royal Baby leaves hospital”, the BBC quickly sacked him for what it described was “a serious error of judgment”.

Social media use and mis-use

Policy on use of social media

How to deal with an employee who has posted negative comments about the organisation on a social networking site

Baker described the now-deleted picture as a “stupid unthinking gag” and the BBC’s decision to sack him as “a masterclass of pompous faux-gravity”.

His sacking follows Shila Iqbal’s sacking from Emmerdale for racially offensive tweets she posted six years ago.

Iqbal has since apologised and said that she meant no malice by the tweets; however, this didn’t stop her being fired from her role on the ITV soap.

With nearly 70% of the UK population using social media such as Facebook, Twitter and Instagram, it is likely that most employees have some form of online presence. These high-profile cases have reignited the debate among employers over how best to handle employees’ use – or misuse – of social media.

Shila Iqbal was axed following historical ‘racist and homophobic’ tweets.
Ian West/PA Wire/PA Images

The first key step for any employer is a pre-emptive one; ensure you have an up-to-date social media policy which has been effectively communicated to your workforce.

The policy should:

  • Clearly set out examples of what constitutes appropriate and inappropriate online behaviour
  • Explain the reputational damage that social media posts can cause to your business and the disciplinary action the business will take if the policy is breached
  • Not too tightly define “social media” as it is a fluid concept with new players entering the game all the time
  • Set guidelines for employees who use social media as part of their job, and include any restrictions that apply to what they are permitted to do or say
  • Make it clear if you intend to monitor your employees’ use of social media, explain the nature and duration of any monitoring and the circumstances in which it will be done
  • Make it clear that online harassment and cyber bullying will be treated as seriously as other types of bullying and harassment. This should also be specifically addressed in your disciplinary and anti-harassment and bullying policies
  • Where employees make reference to their employment anywhere on their personal social media profiles, consider requiring them to include a disclaimer stating that any views they communicate are their own personal views, and not those of their employer.

Despite taking pre-emptive measures, many employers still find themselves having to take disciplinary action against employees who have used social media in an inappropriate or offensive way.

There is no one-size-fits-all approach”

In some circumstances this may include where an employee’s social media postings do not target the business but instead focus on other employees.

Employers have a duty of care towards employees and can be held liable for the acts of employees “in the course of employment”; a concept which has been interpreted broadly by employment tribunals to extend to actions between employees outside the workplace via social media.

It will come as no surprise that when considering the appropriate disciplinary sanction for social media-related offences, there is no one-size-fits-all approach. The sanction must be proportionate to the seriousness of the behaviour. Factors to bear in mind are:

  • Whether the comments were made on a social media account used for personal, rather than work-related, purposes
  • Whether a reasonable reader could rationally conclude that comments consisted of, or included, statements made on the employer’s behalf
  • Where the activity was conducted from and when, ie from a work or personal device and whether it occurred during, or out of, working hours
  • The impact of the employee’s conduct on the business
  • The employee’s position and role
  • Whether the name of the employer or names of clients or colleagues or other identifying information are mentioned in the post
  • Whether the employee was aware, or ought to be aware, their actions breached a social media policy
  • Whether there were mitigating circumstances, such as an apology, how quickly the offensive comments were removed, and the employee’s previous disciplinary record.

In some circumstances dismissal might be appropriate. As with other dismissal cases, the employer’s decision and the process followed must fall within the band of reasonable responses open to the reasonable employer in that particular case. Therefore, taking the above factors (and any existing social media policy) into account is vital.

In addition to having a robust social media policy, employers can protect themselves further by taking steps such as carrying out regular training for employees on acceptable use of social media, with the main message being: tweet others as you would wish to be tweeted.

Avatar
Kirsty Cooke

Kirsty Cooke is a senior associate in the employment team at Ashfords.

previous post
NatWest pays female worker £150,000 to settle equal pay claim
next post
‘Alarming’ levels of PTSD identified among police workforce

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

You may also like

HSBC Holdings employees under scrutiny for WhatsApp use

23 Feb 2022

Employment law 2022: Nick Hurley talks to Oven-Ready...

4 Feb 2022

Covid-related employment cases: 10 key rulings for employers

22 Nov 2021

Hundreds of police officers investigated for sharing offensive...

4 Oct 2021

‘Fragmentation frustration’: Too many HR tools can hamper...

10 Sep 2021

LinkedIn – Love It or Loathe It? John...

2 Sep 2021

Estate agent Savills investigates racist tweet

12 Jul 2021

How to handle controversial employee opinions

6 Jul 2021

How can HR respond if an employee has...

20 Apr 2021

Four ways to make sure employees get the...

23 Dec 2020
  • Apprenticeships are the solution to your recruitment problems PROMOTED | Apprenticeships have the pulling power...Read more
  • What it really means to be mentally fit PROMOTED | What is mental fitness...Read more
  • How music can help to ease anxiety at work PROMOTED | A lot has happened since March 2020, hasn’t it?...Read more
  • Why now is the time to plug the unhealthy gap PROMOTED | We’ve all heard the term ‘health is wealth’...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+