Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Don’t opt out of work time debate

by Personnel Today 26 Nov 2002
by Personnel Today 26 Nov 2002

The
European Commission has asked the Employment Lawyers Association and Personnel
Today to find out what you think about working time. Send us your views

Personnel
Today has teamed up with the Employment Lawyers Association (ELA) to find out
your views on the UK’s controversial opt-out from the Working Time Directive.

We
have been asked by the European Commission to undertake a survey on the use in
the UK of the opt-out from the 48-hour working limit. The findings will help
senior decision-makers in Brussels decide whether the opt-out should be
scrapped.

If
you have views on its significance to the work environment, then please take
five minutes to fill in this simple questionnaire.

The
survey offers you a unique opportunity to have a voice in Europe. Not only will
you be able to influence the shape of an important directive by completing the
survey, you could win a fabulous weekend away for two. The destination? Where
else, but the scenic city of Brussels, of course.

Personnel
Today exclusively revealed that behind-the-scenes talks are taking place in
Brussels which could lead to the UK’s opt-out being removed (News, 12 November).

The
aim of the 1993 directive was to ensure that EU member states introduce
legislation that protects the health and safety of workers by limiting the
average working time for each seven-day period – including overtime – to 48
hours.

Member
states had until November 1996 to implement the directive, but the UK’s opt-out
from the Social Charter delayed the national Working Time Regulations until
October 1998.

The
regulations brought the directive into force in the UK, and gave employers the
opportunity to ask staff to agree in writing to working more than an average 48
hours per week, usually over a 17-week period.

The
UK is the only country to have opted out, and has to comply with certain
conditions, which include employers having to get staff agreement to working
more than 48 hours, keeping records and ensuring that staff will not suffer if
they refuse.

Some
UK employers have reacted angrily to the threatened removal of the opt-out.
They fear that it would be detrimental to both business and employees –
claiming it would demand extensive workforce planning and take work away from
staff that want to earn overtime money.

Personnel
Today’s recent News Barometer survey showed that two-thirds of 140 HR
professionals felt its removal would increase employers’ labour costs.

The
CIPD, however, says scrapping it would help us tackle the long-hours work
culture and be a step forward for UK plc in the productivity debate. The unions
agree, believing it will improve employment relations.

The
EC is about to start a review of the directive and the commissioner
responsible, Fernando Pereira, expects to submit his recommendations within the
next 12 months. If he decides to remove the opt-out, it could happen by the end
of next year.

Commenting
on the launch of the research, John Evans, partner at Coudert Brothers and
chairman of the international committee of the Employment Lawyers Association,
said: "The possible loss of the UK opt-out promises to have a profound
effect on employment practice.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

"It
is therefore important that as many people as possible complete the survey and
give their views to the Commission, so they can make an informed decision."

To take part in the survey, click here. Survey closes 9th
December 2002

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
National Minimum Wage changes introduced
next post
Your chance to influence Brussels and win a trip to…. Brussels!

You may also like

FCA to extend misconduct rules beyond banks

2 Jul 2025

‘Decisive action’ needed to boost workers’ pensions

2 Jul 2025

Business leaders’ drop in confidence impacts headcount

2 Jul 2025

Why we need to rethink soft skills in...

1 Jul 2025

Five misconceptions about hiring refugees

20 Jun 2025

Forward features list 2025 – submitting content to...

23 Nov 2024

Features list 2021 – submitting content to Personnel...

1 Sep 2020

Large firms have no plans to bring all...

26 Aug 2020

A typical work-from-home lunch: crisps

24 Aug 2020

Occupational health on the coronavirus frontline – ‘I...

21 Aug 2020

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+