Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Case lawEmployment lawDismissal

East Lancashire Coachbuilders Limited v Hilton

by Personnel Today 10 Oct 2006
by Personnel Today 10 Oct 2006

Establishing a principal reason for a dismissal

East Lancashire Coachbuilders Limited v Hilton, EAT, 24 August 2006

BACKGROUND

Mr Hilton was a director and joint managing director (MD) of East Lancashire Coachbuilders, having worked there for more than 40 years. He had a poor relationship with the other three directors, who were in the process of acquiring 50% of the shares in a management buyout. Hilton was not part of this and the directors wanted him to cease being the MD and become the development director instead. Hilton had a three-year rolling contract at £90,000 a year, so an agreed termination would have been costly.

A problem arose about his expense claim relating to an airline ticket for his wife. He paid for it, but marked it as a business expense. A cheque for reimbursement was paid to his wife, who also worked at the company. Hilton was subsequently dismissed for gross misconduct. His internal appeal (heard by the other joint MD) was unsuccessful.

Hilton’s claim for unfair dismissal was successful. The tribunal found the dismissal was “opportunistic”. The principal reason for dismissal was not Hilton’s conduct. Rather, it was that the other directors did not want him to stay and that it would be expensive to dismiss him without cause. There was unfairness too in the way the appeal was conducted, but the tribunal ordered a 40% reduction in both the basic and compensatory award because Hilton had exposed himself to disciplinary proceedings through his own actions. The company appealed.

DECISION

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) upheld the decision and found there was evidence that the dismissal was opportunistic. Had the relationship between the directors been normal, Hilton would not have been dismissed. It was also inappropriate for a director with a vested interest in the internal appeal to have responsibility for hearing it.

COMMENT

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

For a dismissal to be fair, an employer must establish that the reason for dismissal is one of the five potentially fair reasons under section 98(1) Employment Rights Act 1996.

If the dismissal was caused by some reason other than the statutory reason, the employer needs to show the statutory reason was the principal one.

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
UK business owners work 18 hours more per week
next post
Are age laws courting disaster?

You may also like

Zero-hours workers’ rights to be extended from beyond...

8 May 2025

Employment tribunal backlog up 23% in a year

7 May 2025

Ministers urged to outlaw misuse of NDAs

7 May 2025

‘Unacceptable to question integrity’ of Supreme Court judgment

2 May 2025

Employment Rights Bill must be tightened to protect...

1 May 2025

Lords criticise ‘opaque’, ‘on-the-hoof’ Employment Rights Bill

30 Apr 2025

Retail HRDs say Employment Rights Bill will have...

29 Apr 2025

Trans ex-judge to appeal Supreme Court biological sex...

29 Apr 2025

EHRC: Interim update on single-sex spaces draws criticism

28 Apr 2025

CIPD: Employment Rights Bill timetable needs clarity

25 Apr 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+