Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Corporate manslaughterEmployment lawLatest News

EEF highlights flaws in Corporate Manslaughter Bill

by Michael Millar 22 Jun 2005
by Michael Millar 22 Jun 2005

Significant flaws still need to be addressed before proposals for a Corporate Manslaughter Bill can gain support from industry, according to EEF, the manufacturers’ organisation.

The government’s present proposals do not support individual liability in a case of corporate manslaughter, a move supported by business but vehemently opposed by the trade unions.

Business argues that existing provisions outside the ‘corporate’ nature of the legislation, such as gross negligence manslaughter,  already cover individual liability.

In its response to the latest Home Office consultation on the draft bill, EEF said the law should be changed to make it easier to hold organisations accountable where gross negligence results in death.

However, EEF argues that the proposals remain significantly flawed because: 

The definition of a senior manager remains limited to those at strategic levels within an organisation. EEf said it needs to be reviewed so that all those who have the freedom to act in a decisive manner within an organisation are covered by the legislation. This would mean managers at local level could be held accountable.

Statutory criteria are proposed to direct a jury in deciding whether an organisation has grossly failed in its duty of care. EEF said  the current criteria are unhelpful and open to wide interpretation.

The Bill proposes to give legal status to all HSE guidance as constituting acceptable performance in health and safety management. EEF said that such guidance is often too general to be meaningful. It proposed that approved codes of practice  be used, as these are already afforded a recognised legal status.

Inclusion of provision for remedial orders – requiring practical steps to address the problem – is a duplication of a power that already exists.

EEF director of health, safety and environment, Gary Booton, said: “Industry supports the principle of this legislation as it will send a strong signal to the tiny minority of businesses which show a wanton disregard for life.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

“However, the current proposals remain flawed and will neither aid prosecution of those responsible for offences nor support efforts to improve health & safety.”

 

Michael Millar

previous post
Employers expect few strikes
next post
Police part timers win pensions boost

You may also like

August lull in recruitment as business gets set...

18 Sep 2025

Social mobility: Privately educated elite still leads UK...

18 Sep 2025

Ministers extend liability for umbrella companies’ unpaid PAYE

18 Sep 2025

‘Flawed system’ blocking apprenticeships from young people

18 Sep 2025

Met Police staff in strike ballot over London...

18 Sep 2025

Personnel Today Awards 2025 shortlist: Workplace culture (smaller...

18 Sep 2025

Trainee GP who displayed Palestine flag sues for...

17 Sep 2025

Graduates face ‘white-collar’ recession in jobs market

17 Sep 2025

Ben & Jerry’s co-founder quits over Unilever’s social...

17 Sep 2025

Inflation unchanged at 3.8% in August

17 Sep 2025

  • Workplace health benefits need to be simplified SPONSORED | Long-term sickness...Read more
  • Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain with centred ergonomics SPONSORED | If you often notice...Read more
  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits Live
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise