Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Latest News

Employers use job descriptions to prevent discrimination

by Personnel Today 27 May 2003
by Personnel Today 27 May 2003

If
you think job descriptions are just another routine part of the recruitment
process, think again, because UK employers are now using them to prevent
discrimination and avoid potential litigation.

While
four in five (82 per cent) employers use job descriptions for some or all of
their vacancies, more than one in five (21.2 per cent) organisations
deliberately use job descriptions in recruitment and selection to prevent
unfair discrimination and for defending cases when it is claimed to have
occurred. 

This
figure rises to almost one in three (31.5 per cent) among public sector
organisations.

The
findings by IRS Employment Review are based on responses from 254 HR
departments surveyed in February and March 2003.

IRS
Employment Review researcher, Noelle Murphy said: “No longer is the job
description just one element of the recruitment process; today, it is much more
influential than many people may realise. The adoption of the EU’s equal
treatment directive will mean that areas such as sexual orientation, religious
belief, political views and age will soon be included in discrimination.

"HR
practitioners need to ensure any criterion used in job descriptions or person
specifications, which could be viewed as discriminatory against a protected
group, is objectively justifiable.”   

Other
findings include: 

·           Public sector organisations are more
likely to have job descriptions for every post – more than nine in 10 (96.2 per
cent) use them for all positions in the organisation. Two in three (66.6 per
cent) private sector service organisations use job descriptions for all posts,
compared with under half (40.9 per cent) that do so in manufacturing and
production organisations

·           One in seven (13.6 per cent)
considered that the culture of their organisation did not support the formality
of job descriptions

·           Sending out job descriptions to
potential candidates is an effective way of adding a dimension of
self-selection to the recruitment process

·           Seven in 10 (69.8 per cent) employers
use job descriptions when appraising employees

·           Four in 10 (39.6 per cent)
organisations make specific reference to job descriptions in employees’
contracts

·           Almost three-quarters (72.8 per cent)
of respondents use person specifications in their organisations. The majority
of these are in the public sector (91.2 per cent) where we would expect to find
the use of more formal, transparent selection and development criteria

·           More than half (55.6 per cent) of
those surveyed use job descriptions to identify training and development needs
for their staff

By Ben Willmott

Personnel Today
Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
TUPE confusion halts public/private progress
next post
Corporate killing back on track

You may also like

Are you a quiet quitter?

12 Aug 2022

July saw highest number of job adverts for...

12 Aug 2022

Transport sector recruitment ‘should be overhauled to improve...

12 Aug 2022

Liz Truss comments on Civil Service dismissed as...

12 Aug 2022

Hot summers, hot desks – employment law advice...

12 Aug 2022

Sharp rise in firms offering enhanced parental leave...

11 Aug 2022

Working in a heatwave: what should employers consider?

11 Aug 2022

Zero-hours contract benefits ‘can outweigh negatives for workers’

11 Aug 2022

Nearly 14,000 whistleblowing reports of furlough fraud received...

11 Aug 2022

Skills passport and new qualifications for care workers...

11 Aug 2022
  • 6 reasons why work-based learning is better than traditional training PROMOTED | A recent Fortune/Deloitte survey found that 71% of CEOs are anticipating that this year’s biggest business disrupter...Read more
  • Strengthening Scotland’s public services through virtual recruiting PROMOTED | This website is Scotland's go-to place for job seekers looking to apply for roles in public services...Read more
  • What’s next for L&D? Enter Alchemist… PROMOTED | It’s time to turn off the tedious and get ready for interactive and immersive learning experiences...Read more
  • Simple mistakes are blighting the onboarding experience PROMOTED | The onboarding of new hires is a company’s best chance...Read more
  • Preventing Burnout: How can HR help key workers get the right help? PROMOTED | Workplace wellbeing may seem a distant memory...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+