Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Case lawEmployment lawEmployment tribunals

Fordyce v Hammersmith & Fulham Conservative Association

by Personnel Today 7 Mar 2006
by Personnel Today 7 Mar 2006

Asleep on the job?

Fordyce v Hammersmith & Fulham Conservative Association, EAT, 13 January 2006

Facts Generally, a tribunal case will be heard by a panel of three members – a legally-qualified chairman, and two lay or ‘wing’ members. During Mrs Fordyce’s tribunal hearing, the association’s lawyer noticed that one of the wing members appeared to have fallen asleep for a significant part of that morning’s evidence.

After lunch, both parties’ lawyers raised the issue with the tribunal in the absence of the parties or their witnesses. The tribunal chairman was assured that the wing member was well, and the lawyers confirmed that their clients were willing to continue with the hearing.

Subsequently, there were further occasions where the same person seemed to be asleep. A trainee barrister took detailed notes of these periods, which were made available to Fordyce’s lawyer at the conclusion of the hearing before any decision was given. At that stage, the matter was not raised again with the chairman.

Decision Fordyce’s unfair dismissal complaint was unsuccessful. She appealed, raising – among other things – the issue of the wing member’s appearance of being asleep for parts of the hearing.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Appeal The appeal was allowed. Referring to the Court of Appeal decision in Stansbury v Data Pulse plc and another [2004] ICR 523, the EAT said that the matter turned on what was reasonable in the particular case. The period of apparent sleep before the matter was raised with the chairman was considered ‘water under the bridge’ – the parties had decided to continue. But that did not apply to any subsequent periods of apparent sleep. A ruling in such circumstances could not be allowed to stand. The case was sent back for rehearing.

Comment The EAT said: “It is surprising that the wing member in question did not take great pains to assume an appearance at least of intelligent interest, but he apparently did not.”

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Whistleblowing: UK employees find illegal or inappropriate activities at work
next post
Focus on significant things: Poor performance

You may also like

Trans row nurse cleared of misconduct as tribunal...

16 Jul 2025

Hugh’s Law calls for paid leave for parents...

16 Jul 2025

Beware the unintended consequences of the NDA ban

16 Jul 2025

Manager dismissed after covert recording with HR wins...

14 Jul 2025

Ministers loosen fire and rehire proposals in Employment...

10 Jul 2025

£188k tribunal award for director sacked after cardiac...

10 Jul 2025

Court of Appeal rules that Ryanair agency pilot...

9 Jul 2025

ADHD and autism diagnosis was evidence of impact,...

9 Jul 2025

Bereavement leave to extend to miscarriages before 24...

7 Jul 2025

Company director wins £15k after being told to...

4 Jul 2025

  • Empower and engage for the future: A revolution in talent development (webinar) WEBINAR | As organisations strive...Read more
  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+