Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employment tribunals

Government launches review of employment tribunal fees

by Personnel Today 12 Jun 2015
by Personnel Today 12 Jun 2015

The Government has announced its review of employment tribunal fees, which it says will result in recommendations for any changes to fee structure and levels.

Since July 2013, workers in the UK have been charged a fee to bring a claim to an employment tribunal, with a further fee if the claim is heard and another charge if they want to appeal the decision.

Employment tribunal fees

Employment tribunal and Employment Appeal Tribunal fees

Type A and type B tribunal claims

Employment tribunal fees: are they blocking access to the tribunal system?

Employment tribunal fees vary depending on the complexity of the case.

For example, to bring a discrimination claim, workers must pay an initial fee of £250 to issue a claim and a further fee of £950 if the claim proceeds to a hearing.

Claimants can apply for remission of the whole or part of a fee if they cannot afford to pay.

Tribunals can order fees to be repaid if the claim is successful.

The terms of reference for the review promise an examination of:

  • employment tribunal data on volume of cases, case progression and case outcomes;
  • research on the views of court and tribunal users;
  • the general trend in the number of cases appearing at employment tribunals;
  • any consequences arising as a result of an improved economy on the number of employees being dismissed;
  • to what extent weak or unmeritorious claims have been discouraged by employment tribunal fees; and
  • if there has been any impact because of changes in employment law.

When tribunal fees were introduced, the Government’s stated aim was to reduce the number of frivolous claims and to help employers avoid costly legal fees handling grievances that could be dealt with away from employment tribunals.

However, employment tribunal fees have come in for heavy criticism for pricing workers who are treated unfairly out of access to justice.

The employment tribunal fees system has also been the subject of a legal challenge from Unison.

In February 2014, the trade union’s first challenge was unsuccessful, with the High Court stressing that it was too early at that point (around six months after the fee scheme was introduced) to judge the effectiveness and impact of employment tribunal fees.

In December 2014, a second challenge came before the High Court, with Unison allowed to introduce new statistical information suggesting that certain vulnerable groups, such as single mothers, would be particularly disadvantaged by employment tribunal fees.

However, this case also failed. Unison has appealed and the Court of Appeal is due to hear the case later in June.

Stephen Simpson, principal employment law editor at XpertHR, said: “This review has been promised for a while, and it’s no surprise that the announcement has been timed to appear shortly before Unison’s latest challenge to tribunal fees is heard in the Court of Appeal, which is sure to get a lot of publicity.

“On the same day as the review was announced, the Government published the latest quarterly statistics on employment tribunal claims received, covering January to March 2015. I always look at the number of unfair dismissal claims first, as they give a good indication as anything of the state of play.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

“The unfair dismissal figures tell their own story: in the first quarter of 2015, 3,065 claims were brought, compared with 11,041 in the same quarter in 2013.”

The review is expected to be completed later in 2015.

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Woolworths case: has collective redundancy consultation become too arbitrary?
next post
How to get the most out of good leaver/bad leaver provisions

You may also like

HR manager with ‘messy’ work loses discrimination case

25 Jun 2025

Man who used company credit card for himself...

23 Jun 2025

AI company did not racially discriminate against Chinese...

20 Jun 2025

Barts nurse told to remove watermelon image claims...

19 Jun 2025

WFH employee who falsified timesheets loses unfair dismissal...

16 Jun 2025

Sleeping security officer wins £20k for unfair dismissal

16 Jun 2025

Menopause claims triple in two years, tribunal figures...

16 Jun 2025

The employer strikes back: the rise of ‘quiet...

13 Jun 2025

Former employees of Wilko gain £2m payout

13 Jun 2025

Lawyers warn over impact of Employment Rights Bill...

13 Jun 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+