Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Gross misconduct clause must be clearly defined

by Personnel Today 10 Jun 2003
by Personnel Today 10 Jun 2003

Employers need to ensure staff understand their employment contracts, as
sacking an employee for gross misconduct has recently been the subject of
debate

Gross misconduct should be relatively straightforward. An employment
contract usually defines what is acceptable behaviour in the workplace and employees
abide by that. To commit an act of gross misconduct is to breach that contract,
and is therefore a sackable offence. Simple!

However, recently this area has been the subject of debate, most notably in
a case where we acted for the claimant – a sacked managing director, referred
to as Mr X.

The High Court found in favour of Mr X in his claim for breach of contract
against the company, Y plc, which had sacked him for gross misconduct over
unauthorised absence from the office and not working normal hours.

However, Mr X was cleared of misconduct for carrying out much of his work
from 1993 to 2001 in clubs, cafes and while walking in the park when he was
dismissed.

The court found that Mr X had reasonably believed that his style of working
was accepted by his employer.

Gross misconduct has to be clearly defined and then proved. It cannot be
retrospectively defined, but any contract can have broad scope by referring to
‘any act of a similar nature considered gross misconduct’ by the company’s
management.

Nevertheless, a tribunal could disagree with such an assessment and find in
favour of a potential claimant on such grounds. Some examples are clear cut:
stealing, violent aggression, criminal prosecution. Others can be tricky if an
employer has been less than rigorous in monitoring or illustrating expectations
and results.

But gross misconduct is a very serious reason for dismissal. In many cases,
it is seen as the most effective way of getting rid of a key employee,
particularly if that employee’s contract has certain stipulations in their
favour that would be rendered null and void on gross misconduct grounds.
Clauses such as a notice period pay-off or an equity settlement are frequently
disputed.

Some employers will go to great lengths to prove misconduct in the first
place. A private detective could be brought in to dig for dirt, and that can
bring problems. This could be a clear invasion of privacy, and the allegations
could be construed as spurious, or even slanderous. To go so far is a risk, and
any employer would have to be sure of how calculated it is.

The lesson to employers is that if certain behaviour is allowed to continue,
even when contrary to workplace regulations or contractual obligations, it is
consented to by implication.

If an employer does object or enforce any regulation (via the disciplinary
procedure), it has to be done properly and the employee given time to adjust.
Otherwise, an unfair dismissal claim could be in the offing.

An employer’s silence on workplace behaviour that is not true to established
procedure effectively waives the right to enforce those regulations, and
invalidates any potential action on gross misconduct grounds.

Most employers appreciate that executives can put in significant amounts of
time, which they are neither contracted nor obliged to do.

Travelling time, particularly abroad, is a prime example. Most employees
exercise discretion and an hour in the gym mid-afternoon when no lunch break
has been taken is a standard illustration of time management when it comes to
balancing the personal side of life with the professional.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Both employers and employees should nevertheless be aware of either side’s
position, and just how thin the line is when they come close to crossing it.

By Alain Cohen, director, Ashby Cohen Solicitors

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Pay strikes will hit secondary schools hard
next post
CRB steps up its workload

You may also like

Forward features list 2025 – submitting content to...

23 Nov 2024

Features list 2021 – submitting content to Personnel...

1 Sep 2020

Large firms have no plans to bring all...

26 Aug 2020

A typical work-from-home lunch: crisps

24 Aug 2020

Occupational health on the coronavirus frontline – ‘I...

21 Aug 2020

Occupational Health & Wellbeing research round-up: August 2020

7 Aug 2020

Acas: Redundancy related enquiries surge 160%

5 Aug 2020

Coronavirus: lockdown ‘phase two’ may bring added headaches...

17 Jul 2020

Unemployment to top 4 million as workers come...

15 Jul 2020

Over 1,000 UK redundancies expected at G4S Cash...

14 Jul 2020

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+