Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Latest NewsEconomics, government & business

Industry reacts to welfare reform proposals

by Daniel Thomas 12 Nov 2010
by Daniel Thomas 12 Nov 2010

The Government has unveiled its White Paper on welfare reform, which includes proposals to launch a single universal credit to replace work-related benefits, ensure that work always pays more than benefits, and force some long-term unemployed claimants to take on mandatory work placements. Daniel Thomas analyses the reaction.

Attempts at welfare reform are not new. The first powers to dock the benefits of the “workshy” were introduced in the 1913 Bill that created unemployment benefit. However, the coalition Government remains convinced that its proposals, announced by work and pensions secretary Iain Duncan Smith, will go a long way to getting more people into work. Duncan Smith said that the reforms would reduce the number of workless households by 300,000 and make work pay for 700,000 low-earning employees.

Nigel Meager, director of the Institute for Employment Studies, described the plans as “highly ambitious” and welcomed the introduction of a universal credit and the greater flexibility of financial incentives to help make sure that work pays.

But while he admitted that mandatory work placements could prove useful, Meager warned that the scheme had inherent risks.

“To be of real benefit to the unemployed, and to add credibility to their CVs in the eyes of employers, the activities need to be as similar as possible to ‘real jobs’,” he said.

“However, if they are too similar, there is a risk that they will displace real jobs, undercutting with free or cheap labour, activities which would otherwise be undertaken by employees of public or private sector organisations.

“It is easy to imagine that, in the current climate of financial stringency, local authorities and others will be tempted to substitute ‘volunteers’ to cover the activities of redundant public servants.”

John Cridland, CBI deputy director-general, said that employers would support the Government’s plans to make work pay by getting more people into the jobs market.

“As the economy recovers and the private sector creates jobs, companies must be able to access people with the right skills and work ethic,” he said. “The Government should make the most of private and voluntary sector expertise in helping the long-term unemployed back into work.”

However, Cridland warned that the administration of the universal credit must be simple. “We would be concerned about any moves to take away responsibility for paying staff from companies, as this could undermine the relationship between employers and employees,” he said.

Meager sounded a further note of caution, stressing that the reforms rely entirely on supply-side interventions; encouraging or compelling those out of work to take the available jobs.

“As the country slowly emerges from the deepest recession in living memory, and job losses in the public sector begin to bite, the main challenge will be whether sufficient numbers of new jobs can be created in the private sector to provide opportunities for the workless groups targeted by the welfare reform,” he said.

Unions are not convinced that this challenge will be met. TUC general secretary Brendan Barber said: “With five people already chasing every job, the problem is not workshy scroungers but a shortage of jobs.

“It looks very much as if the Government is trying to blame the victims, while covering up the spending cuts that have already ended the Future Jobs Fund and that will throw up to a million extra people on the dole.”

Those on the other end of the political spectrum argue that the proposals do not go far enough. The Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA), a right-wing think tank, said that the reforms will only work if the minimum wage is abolished or drastically reduced.

“Iain Duncan Smith has rightly analysed the welfare problem, but is only part of the way to a welfare solution,” said Mark Littlewood, IEA’s director general. “Of course, we need to ensure that it pays to work. It’s insane that it can be more profitable to be on welfare than in employment.”

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

HR professionals will be essential in ensuring the success of the welfare reform agenda, according to employment minister Chris Grayling.

Speaking at the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development annual conference in Manchester, he said: “We can only do it in partnership with employers. It’s a big challenge, it can make a big social difference, but you, perhaps more than any group in the country, if we get it right, your addition really can make a difference.”

Daniel Thomas

previous post
Business communication use of social media predicted to soar
next post
BA threat to striking workers raises ‘a complex legal issue’

You may also like

Company director wins £15k after being told to...

4 Jul 2025

Skills shortfall in construction threatens housing target

4 Jul 2025

MPs demand Home Office tightens visas to protect...

4 Jul 2025

It’s all about the Monet: how art transforms...

3 Jul 2025

Stop chasing quick fixes: return to the office...

3 Jul 2025

Asda hails major upgrade in employees’ benefits

3 Jul 2025

100% success for latest large-scale four-day week trial

3 Jul 2025

NHS 10-year Health Plan sets out vision for...

3 Jul 2025

Microsoft to cut 9,000 jobs globally as role...

3 Jul 2025

Decline in workplace deaths: falls from height remain...

3 Jul 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+