Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Employment lawCase lawRedundancy

Junk v Kuhnel, European Court of Justice January 2005

by Eversheds HR Group 15 Feb 2005
by Eversheds HR Group 15 Feb 2005

Duty to consult
Junk v Kuhnel, European Court of Justice January 2005

In this important decision, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has addressed the issue of an employer’s duty to inform and consult with employees before undertaking collective redundancies.

Junk worked as a care assistant. After her employer became insolvent, she was given notice by the liquidator on 27 June 2002 that he intended to terminate the contracts of employment and to carry out a collective redundancy with termination effective from 30 September 2002.

Relying on a particular interpretation of the Collective Redundancies Directive, she argued before the Labour Court of Germany that her redundancy had been ineffective.

The court stayed the proceedings and referred two questions to the ECJ for preliminary ruling. First, should ‘redundancy’ under the directive be interpreted as meaning the notice of dismissal, or did it mean the termination of the employment relationship upon expiry of the period of notice?

Second, if the answer to the first question was that redundancy meant the notice of dismissal, did the directive require that the consultation procedure under Article 2 of the directive and the notification procedure under Articles 3 and 4 were to be concluded before the notices of dismissal were announced?

The directive states that these obligations should be complied with before the redundancies come into effect, but leaves the term ‘redundancy’ undefined.

The ECJ ruled that redundancy for these purposes means when the notice of potential redundancy is announced, and not when the actual contract of employment is terminated. It rejected the UK government’s submission that redundancy must refer to the point at which employment relations come to an end, rather than when notice of potential redundancy is given. It said that the spirit of the legislation would be undermined if it was possible to give notice of termination prior to the conclusion of any consultation process.

Avatar
Eversheds HR Group

previous post
Restaurateurs team up to block proposed smoking bans
next post
Setting up a homeworking initiative

You may also like

Employment law changes for 2022 and beyond: update...

1 Jul 2022

Royal Mail managers vote to strike over restructure

30 Jun 2022

Christian doctor loses transgender pronoun case, but beliefs...

29 Jun 2022

Long Covid: what tribunal’s disability ruling means for...

23 Jun 2022

How HR can mitigate the risks and reap...

10 Jun 2022

Oxford study highlights best gig economy firms to...

9 Jun 2022

Tesco appeal against fire and rehire ban to...

8 Jun 2022

Bank holidays: six things employers need to know

5 Jun 2022

Top 10 HR questions May 2022: Bank holidays

1 Jun 2022

Frewer v Google: How it’s getting harder to...

30 May 2022
  • The ultimate guide to payroll for small businesses PROMOTED | You’ve started a business that has expanded to the point of requiring more staff to meet demand. Congratulations!...Read more
  • NSPCC revamps its learning strategy with child wellbeing at its heart PROMOTED | The NSPCC’s mission is to prevent abuse and neglect...Read more
  • Diversity versus inclusion: Why the difference matters PROMOTED | It’s possible for an environment to be diverse, but not inclusive...Read more
  • Five steps for organisations across the globe to become more skills-driven PROMOTED | The shift in the world of work has been felt across the globe...Read more
  • The future of workforce development PROMOTED | Northumbria University and partners share insight...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+