Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Age discriminationEquality, diversity and inclusion

Legal Q&A: Age discrimination

by Personnel Today 5 Jun 2007
by Personnel Today 5 Jun 2007

Eight months after the legislation was introduced, age discrimination claims are picking up in momentum and reaching the headlines. The Observer recently reported that Buckingham Palace may have fallen foul of the age discrimination legislation by placing advertisements saying that it won’t recruit anyone aged 64 or over.

Q What was wrong with Buckingham Palace requiring applicants to be under 64 when they would have had to retire at 65 anyway – is this not justifiable?

A The Age Regulations only provide an express ‘get out’ clause if the applicant is within six months of retirement, not one year. The Royal Family will have to objectively justify excluding any applicants aged between 64 and 64-and-a-half from job opportunities.

The most likely objective justification would be that training requirements make it impractical to employ anyone so near to retirement. However, if a position does not require significant training, the objective justification defence will be much more difficult, and the Royals may have to look to another business need to justify the requirement.

Q Can I sue Buckingham Palace over the job advertisement even if I didn’t apply?

A No. A Bristol employment tribunal has ruled that a person needs to actually apply for a job and be refused either an interview or be unsuccessful at interview to have suffered less favourable treatment. The tribunal said the legislation was not intended to enable members of the public to act as ‘age policemen’, and that advertising in this way, unwise as it is, is not itself illegal.

Q Last year was full of warnings and alerts – the age regulations were on the way and I’d better be ready or else. So why haven’t I heard about any big cases?

A You may not hear about big age discrimination cases in the same way that ‘Sex in the City’ discrimination cases have hit the headlines in the past few years, but don’t be fooled into thinking that the hype was over nothing. Ageism claims have steadily been flowing into the employment tribunal system. According to the Department of Trade and Industry, about six months after the laws came into force on 1 October 2006, nearly 600 claims were lodged.

So why haven’t you heard about them? The first claims have only begun within the past three months or so to reach the tribunal hearing stage. This is because of the requirement to raise a grievance and attempt to resolve the dispute internally before filing a claim at tribunal. The employment tribunal procedure itself then means that it takes yet more time before cases are actually heard. In addition, employment tribunal decisions are not openly published, which means that cases are currently being reported by word of mouth.

Q Six hundred claims doesn’t sound like much. Has it all been a lot of hot air then?

A No. Six hundred age claims in a little over half a year is not insignificant. To put the figure into perspective, it is approximately equal to the combined number of all sexual orientation and religious discrimination claims that were filed in the entire first year after they were introduced.

Q So what’s the biggest ageism news story?

A Heyday v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, the case challenging the UK’s default retirement age of 65, made big headlines earlier this year. The case has been referred to the European Court of Justice (ECJ). However, a recent opinion of the advocate general (head of the European court), in a related Spanish ECJ case (Felix Palacios De La Villa v Cortefiel Servicios SA), indicated that having a retirement age can be lawful. This Spanish case will be finally decided by the ECJ later this year, and if the court confirms the advocate general’s opinion, the chances of the UK Heyday case succeeding will be considerably weakened.

However, although retirement hit the headlines, it has not been the biggest focus of the claims reaching the employment tribunals.

Q What claims are the tribunals seeing?

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

A Recruitment appears to be resulting in the most claims. This is surprising, as this is the one stage of employment over which employers have a lot of control, as they can put in detailed processes and provide training on recruitment to managers and HR personnel.

Recruitment was, and still is, the source of the most complaints in Ireland, which has had age discrimination legislation in place since 1998.

By Vanessa Hogan, associate, Lovells Employment Group


Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) starts hunt to replace outgoing director-general Geoff Armstrong
next post
Absolutely launches free online training for smoking ban

You may also like

Decision to sack man for Michael Jackson noises...

29 Aug 2025

EHRC acts on policies flouting law on single-sex...

28 Aug 2025

Data bias means gender pay gap wider than...

26 Aug 2025

Council defends suggested alternatives to ‘husband’ and ‘wife’

21 Aug 2025

‘Noisy and boisterous’ younger colleagues not age-related harassment

20 Aug 2025

British Transport Police first force to hire part-time...

19 Aug 2025

Eurostar’s Georgie Willis a keynote speaker at Employee...

19 Aug 2025

Stroke survivor settles discrimination case for £100k

8 Aug 2025

Worker awarded £3,000 for ‘Slave’ graffiti employer had...

7 Aug 2025

Civil Service launches drive to attract interns from...

1 Aug 2025

  • Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain with centred ergonomics SPONSORED | If you often notice...Read more
  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits Live
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise