Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Legal Q&A: Consultation on age discrimination

by Personnel Today 3 Jul 2003
by Personnel Today 3 Jul 2003

By
Richard Linskell, partner, Dawsons Solicitors

Q.
Why is the Government proposing to introduce legislation on age discrimination?

A.
Age discrimination has been a hot topic for some time. The Government is
committed to introducing legislation outlawing age discrimination under the
European Employment Framework Directive. This is also set against the
background of the Government’s need to deal with the ageing workforce and the
‘pensions timebomb’.

Q.
What is age discrimination and whom does it affect?

A.
The proposals, which are due to start on 1 October 2006, will outlaw direct and
indirect age discrimination. Direct discrimination occurs when a decision is
made on the basis of a person’s actual or perceived age. Indirect
discrimination occurs when a policy or practice applies to everyone but
disadvantages certain groups (that is, younger or older people) unless there
are justifiable reasons. The legislation will apply to employers, providers of
vocational training and trade unions, professional associations and employers’
organisations.

Q.
What are the Government’s main proposals?

A.
The key proposals are as follows:

–
Compulsory retirement ages will be outlawed unless they are justified. The
Government is consulting on whether, in exceptional cases, employers should be
able to justify mandatory retirement ages and on whether there should be a
default retirement age of 70, after which no justification would be required.
There will also be no upper age limit on the right to claim unfair dismissal
– Decisions on recruitment, selection and promotion based on age, including
applying an age limit on recruitment, will be unlawful unless they can be
justified
– Employers can continue to provide pay and non-pay benefits based on length of
service or experience, if it is justifiable
– In the calculation of the basic award for unfair dismissal and the statutory
redundancy payment, age would cease to be a factor, although 20 years’ service
would continue to be the maximum which could be taken into account. The
Government is consulting on when the right to a redundancy payment should
cease.

Q.
On what basis will using age as a factor be justified?

A.
The Government is proposing specific aims for the legislation which would be
used in determining whether discrimination is justified. Those aims are:

–
Health, welfare and safety – for example, the protection of younger workers
– Facilitation of employment planning – for example, where the business has a
number of people approaching retirement age at the same time
– The particular training requirement of the post in question – the
Government’s cites as an example air traffic controllers, who need to have high
levels of health, fitness and concentration, and need to undergo extensive
training
– The need for a reasonable period of employment before retirement.

Q.
What will be the impact of this legislation?

A.
Age discrimination legislation will have a profound impact on every decision
made by employers. Employers will need to consider whether any decision related
to employment adversely effects one age group or another. Employers and their
legal advisers will need to second guess what an employment tribunal might
consider to be justifiable.

Q.
What will be the impact on recruitment practices?

A.
Although recruiting within particular age bands will not be outlawed, employers
will need to think carefully whether it is justifiable. For example, on
graduate recruitment programmes, it is unlikely to be justifiable to limit them
to people below a certain age when there may be significant numbers of mature
graduates. Equally, B&Q’s policy of specifically recruiting older workers
is unlikely to be justifiable. Employment tribunals will not be too impressed
with employers who limit recruitment to, say, those under 25 because they have a
young team, or to those over 35 because they want mature employees, as each
application would have to be justified on its own merits.

Q.
What will this mean in relation to older workers whose productivity is
declining due to their age?

A.
Employers have often taken advantage of set retirement ages to allow someone
with declining performance due to their age to leave work with some dignity. It
is likely that, in future, employers will need to manage performance more
closely and, possibly, to dismiss older workers due to performance, obviously
after having gone through a fair procedure. This will add an enormous
additional burden onto employers and it is unlikely to be welcomed by those
subject to such procedures whose dignity may be harmed at the end of a long
working life.

Q.
Am I able to make any comments on the proposals?

A.
The consultation lasts until 20 October 2003. The consultation documents are on
the DTI’s website at www.dti.gov.uk/er/equality/age.htm

Avatar
Personnel Today

previous post
Rising prison population causes staff absence crisis
next post
Union attacks Anglican church over redundancies

You may also like

Five steps for organisations across the globe to...

8 Jun 2022

The Search for Talent: Six Major Employer Pitfalls

24 May 2022

Grants scheme set up to support women’s health...

16 May 2022

How music can help to ease anxiety at...

9 May 2022

OH will be key to navigating ‘second pandemic’...

14 Apr 2022

OH urged to be aware of abortion consultations...

8 Apr 2022

How coached eCBT is returning the workplace to...

8 Apr 2022

Why now is the time to plug the...

7 Apr 2022

Two-thirds of shift workers feel health affected by...

18 Mar 2022

TUC warns of April Covid risk assessment ‘confusion’

14 Mar 2022
  • NSPCC revamps its learning strategy with child wellbeing at its heart PROMOTED | The NSPCC’s mission is to prevent abuse and neglect...Read more
  • Diversity versus inclusion: Why the difference matters PROMOTED | It’s possible for an environment to be diverse, but not inclusive...Read more
  • Five steps for organisations across the globe to become more skills-driven PROMOTED | The shift in the world of work has been felt across the globe...Read more
  • The future of workforce development PROMOTED | Northumbria University and partners share insight...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+