Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Letters

by Personnel Today 19 Feb 2002
by Personnel Today 19 Feb 2002

This
week’s letters

Question:
was it a slip-up or set-up?

I
have noticed a discrepancy in the wording between the News Barometer question
in the magazine (News, 5 February) and the one published on personneltoday.com.

It
could be suggested this is no error, but a cynical attempt to manipulate the
survey to get the desired result.

In
the magazine the question asked: "Do you support compulsory arbitration in
disputes that affect the public?" On the website this was changed to:
"Would you support the introduction of compulsory arbitration in disputes
damaging to essential public services?"

These
two questions measure the views of two completely different issues and the
results therefore have questionable validity.

I
am a rail commuter currently affected by the industrial action. But I recognise
that this service is run to create a profit for its shareholders and not
because of a ‘public service ethos’. I therefore accept the right of the
workforce to engage in industrial action and, although unhappy at the
disruption, I would be against any attempt to enforce arbitration on the
workers.

However,
I support compulsory arbitration where a dispute is damaging to an essential
public service, such as the health, fire and police services. 

You
now have my views on the two very different questions.

Ian
McFadyen
Training officer, Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council

Other
side of the SWT strike story

I
read with interest the front-page story concerning the strike action of South
West Trains’ workers (News, 5 February).

I
take the side of the RMT union. There is more to this dispute than meets the
eye. It must also be remembered the RMT is also protesting against the rail
operator’s disciplinary procedures.

HR
is reluctant to look into the complaints and the RMT is simply fighting for its
members’ rights. The bad management lies with the HR team – it is their fault
the problems have escalated.

Alice
Lotts
Leyton

Help
at hand for prime graduates

I
was glad to read there is still a growing market for graduates. (News, 15
January).

However,
I was surprised there was no mention of graduate employability. While Carl
Gilleard, chief executive of the Association of Graduate Recruiters, claims
that graduates need to be flexible in their choice of industry and understand
the skills needed, there is no mention of the Graduate Apprenticeship Scheme.

The
scheme is designed to enhance the employability of higher education graduates
by combining existing HE qualifications with work-based learning.

It
offers a viable alternative for organisations that lack the time and resources
to implement an internal graduate programme.

More
than 50 HE institutes and 36 NTOs have been involved in the initiative to date,
and employers such as Unisys are already integrating them into their
recruitment and training programmes.

We
are looking for more support from both employer and representative bodies,
through the Graduate Apprenticeship National Network. With this level of
backing, we can go on to develop a system that is more responsive to changes in
employer demands.

Professor
Simon Roodhouse
Chief operating officer, University Vocational Awards Council, Bolton Institute
[email protected]

Testing
times for spoiled students

Exam
board Edexcel shouldn’t be castigated for providing students with unanswerable
exam questions. It should be congratulated by HR for devising a new style of
test more suited to the needs of the real world.

Further
ideas could include examiners refusing to hand over questions, or telling
students half-way through that they only have five minutes to go. Maybe one
favoured pupil could even be given the answers.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Such
developments would be a refreshing change to the current spoon-fed exam system
which fails to prepare students for our fast-changing times.

Andy
Green
Managing director, creativity@work

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
TUC urges employers to get tough over workplace violence
next post
CPS devolves diversity to tackle institutional racism

You may also like

Why we need to rethink soft skills in...

1 Jul 2025

Five misconceptions about hiring refugees

20 Jun 2025

Forward features list 2025 – submitting content to...

23 Nov 2024

Features list 2021 – submitting content to Personnel...

1 Sep 2020

Large firms have no plans to bring all...

26 Aug 2020

A typical work-from-home lunch: crisps

24 Aug 2020

Occupational health on the coronavirus frontline – ‘I...

21 Aug 2020

Occupational Health & Wellbeing research round-up: August 2020

7 Aug 2020

Acas: Redundancy related enquiries surge 160%

5 Aug 2020

Coronavirus: lockdown ‘phase two’ may bring added headaches...

17 Jul 2020

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+