Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Latest NewsPublic sectorIndustrial action / strikesHuman rights

Minimum-service strike laws would allow dismissals

by Rob Moss 5 Jan 2023
by Rob Moss 5 Jan 2023 Image: Vuk Valcic / ZUMA Press / Alamy
Image: Vuk Valcic / ZUMA Press / Alamy

New anti-strike laws, intended to mandate frontline workers to maintain minimum levels of service, would allow employers to dismiss staff who refuse to work, according to reports.

As early as today, the government is expected to unveil a package of measures, aimed at restricting the scale of strikes for workers in sectors including rail, health, education, fire and rescue and the Border Force.

The proposals also include allowing employers to commence legal action against trade unions that fail to provide minimum levels of service.

As first reported in The Times, the government is set to legislate for tougher thresholds to be reached before industrial action can take place. This includes doubling the notice period of a union’s intention to strike from 14 to 28 days and reducing the current six-month limit that allows industrial action after a successful ballot of members.

A previous plan to increase the threshold for industrial action from 40% to 50% of eligible members is expected to be abandoned, in an effort to speed up the expected legislation’s passage through Parliament.

A government source told the newspaper: “This legislation will remove the legal immunity for strikes where unions fail to implement a minimum level of service. The strikes will be illegal. Ultimately people could be fired for breach of contract.”

Minimum service strike laws

Days lost to strikes highest since 2011

Sunak working on ‘tough’ laws to crack down on strikes

They added that it was not the government’s intention to penalise individuals but to ensure that essential services would be protected.

Minimum service levels for each sector would have to be agreed between the government and unions but if no agreement were reached, the matter would be referred to the Central Arbitration Committee.

The anti-strike package is likely to meet strong opposition, however, with some doubt cast over whether the measures could pass the House of Lords, and immediate legal challenges by the unions. The TUC told the Times that the measures were “unworkable, counterproductive and almost certainly in breach of the Human Rights Act 1998”.

Shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme that Labour would not support a bill aiming to curb strike action.

“If you say that people can’t take industrial action, to say that we’re going from clapping our nurses to sacking them for taking industrial action – which is what the government is now threatening – the idea that that‘s going to produce outcomes and reduce delays for patients, that’s just for the birds.”

Daniel Zona, associate at law firm Collyer Bristow, said: “Employers may find they are able to effectively disregard strike action, or at least give it less significance, in negotiations with unions if they’re still able to provide a minimum service.

“If made law, these changes would amount to one of the most significant curbs on the fundamental right to strike in recent decades. It could in effect amount to forcing some workers to work against their will. The proposed changes could breach human rights legislation and potentially modern slavery laws.

“It is likely the proposed changes would be counterproductive and lead to further disruption and legal challenges by unions and other interested groups.”

Yesterday, Paul Nowak, general secretary of the TUC, called for an urgent meeting with prime minister Rishi Sunak to resolve the numerous pay disputes across the public sector.

HR opportunities in the public sector on Personnel Today


Browse more HR opportunities in the public sector

Rob Moss
Rob Moss

Rob Moss is a business journalist with more than 25 years' experience. He has been editor of Personnel Today since 2010. He joined the publication in 2006 as online editor of the award-winning website. Rob specialises in labour market economics, gender diversity and family-friendly working. He has hosted hundreds of webinar and podcasts. Before writing about HR and employment he ran news and feature desks on publications serving the global optical and eyewear market, the UK electrical industry, and energy markets in Asia and the Middle East.

previous post
2023 predictions for HR: From ‘quiet hiring’ to help with healing
next post
Why the Faculty of Occupational Health Nursing needs support from the profession in 2023

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

You may also like

University unions reject latest pay offer

27 Jan 2023

Who is on strike and when?

26 Jan 2023

ILO denies it backs minimum service strikes bill

18 Jan 2023

Train drivers strike in February announced

17 Jan 2023

Teachers to strike for four days in February...

17 Jan 2023

UK universities face 18 days of strikes

13 Jan 2023

NASUWT ballot fails to meet threshold for teachers...

12 Jan 2023

100,000 civil servants to strike on 1 February

12 Jan 2023

Strikes Bill: when the unthinkable becomes policy

12 Jan 2023

Employment law in 2023: What can HR expect?

11 Jan 2023

  • The Workplace Today Guide: Why it pays to support your staff’s financial health PROMOTED | The cost of living crisis has hit...Read more
  • abrdn pensions master trust: an enhanced member experience PROMOTED | For most people, their pension will be the largest source of income in retirement...Read more
  • How can HR equip leaders to support a wounded workforce? PROMOTED | The World Health Organisation (WHO) has released new guidelines for employers...Read more
  • How HR manages absence and hybrid working (survey) WEBINAR | HR professionals are slowly realising...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2023

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2023 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+