Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Criminal recordsLatest NewsPre-employment screeningReferences

What the Oxfam scandal can teach us about background checking

by David Haines 5 Mar 2018
by David Haines 5 Mar 2018 ANDY RAIN/EPA-EFE/REX/Shutterstock
ANDY RAIN/EPA-EFE/REX/Shutterstock

The recent scandals involving Oxfam and other charities have come as a surprise to many, but could these embarrassing allegations have been avoided through better background checking and tighter recruitment practices? David Haines from Xref looks at the evidence.

Stories of harassment, sexual exploitation, witness intimidation and staff bullying – it’s some charge sheet that global charity, Oxfam, is having to answer to at the moment.

Background checking

Background screening: Eight key checks employers must make

Recruitment background checks

It’s not just Oxfam that’s been implicated in the recent scandal, though. The due diligence conducted by the HR and recruitment functions within the non-profit sector as a whole has been put under the microscope.

In truth, any organisations that work with vulnerable people or issues are typically among the most scrutinised. In that regard, you can easily add welfare, care and education to the list of sectors that may be in the spotlight just a little more from now on.

This is a watershed moment and a wake-up call for many organisations, including the likes of Unicef and the United Nations, who have also been indicted in this recent scandal.

Tackling the issues

The damage, both reputational and financial, feels almost irrevocable for Oxfam right now, but the responses need to be swift and considered.

Immediate effort is required to re-establish the core ethical values on which the charity was founded so the culture is right. Equally important is the need to ensure that recruitment and wider HR systems and processes are watertight to guarantee the right people are in the right roles representing the organisation.

Until this happens, donors will stay away and the unwanted questions will keep coming thick and fast.

What is consistent for the entire non-profit sector is the need for efficiency, validity and accuracy.

Following the initial internal investigation, Oxfam detailed plans to update codes of conduct, increase awareness training and arrange meetings with female staff to examine workplace culture. These are sensible steps.

Worryingly, though, Oxfam seems less focused on the other key area – recruitment. Their statement, said: “…there is nothing we can do to stop individuals falsifying references or getting colleagues to provide a reference in a personal capacity…”

This is not true. There are myriad innovations specialising in HR technology and they’re all geared to in some way make the end-to-end recruitment process far more efficient and effective, not least reference checking. As such, this could well be the easiest part of the overall fix.

Know who you’re recruiting

Gathering meaningful references is fundamental to the recruitment process. It is usually the final task to be conducted before an offer is made and is the only aspect of the whole recruitment journey that incorporates the input and validation of a third party.

However, it’s also the part that is traditionally open to human error, discrimination and fraud.

In the UK alone, there are 167,000 registered charities and, with the typically adopted, manual approach, reference checking can be clunky, slow and expensive. If you’re a global charity and often recruiting quickly in times of crisis, it’s very easy to see why corners are cut, but no charity can afford to do so. The risk is too great.

Xref was launched to offer organisations, big and small, a smart solution to candidate referencing by automating the process. Key to its success are the data-driven candidate insights it generates to allow recruiters to make smart, confident hiring decisions.

The platform captures 60% more data than traditional reference checking methods and boasts a more than 90% completion rate on references – a vast improvement on traditional methods.

Minimise risk

As a cloud-based tool, it makes reference checking quick too – it takes just 30 seconds to complete a reference request, with multi-language capabilities included, and it can be done anywhere, anytime and on any device, making it five times faster when compared to traditional referencing.

Efficiency aside, technology is also safeguarding organisations from human error and human nature. These can result in charities unwittingly asking discriminatory questions, taking references without a candidate’s consent and recording details incorrectly.

Equally, traditional recruitment methods can also easily fall foul of fraudulent activity. And fraud is rife.

A recent study by Xref discovered that, in the UK:

  • 36% of jobseekers have admitted exaggerating their work experience;
  • 29% admitted to having deliberately lied to a potential employer; and
  • nearly a third of candidates take advantage of the flawed reference checking process.

No organisations, non-profit or otherwise, can afford to ignore such statistics.

Charities are beginning to recognise the value that technology can bring to their recruitment processes for all of the above reasons.

Xref now works with the likes of Sue Ryder – a UK charity that provides compassionate care to people with end of life and long term needs – and The Salvation Army, an international movement with over 1.5 million members, that helps communities and individuals in need.

Positive change

Organisations like Oxfam may be ‘non-profit’, but they handle hundreds of millions of pounds in charitable donations and work with vulnerable people the world over.

From senior level executives to temporary volunteers, they recruit millions across the world. There will always be people with the wrong intentions or those who make mistakes, which, as recently evident, can severely harm both the reputation and effectiveness of a charity’s work.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

But the tools do exist to filter out malpractices and bring a level of stability and security to the overall recruitment process.

There is no reason charities can’t, and every reason they should, tighten up outdated, or even non-existent recruitment methods. With the spotlight firmly on Oxfam, the charity is well placed to take the lead and strike positive change across the sector.

David Haines

David Haines is a director at Xref.

previous post
Solving the skills crisis one apprenticeship at a time
next post
Gender pay gap: employers know the clock is ticking

You may also like

Iceland Foods considers jobs for low-risk offenders

27 Jan 2025

Post Office scandal police probe to draw in...

12 Dec 2024

Extra background checks could trigger more discrimination claims

10 Dec 2024

Benjamin Mendy awarded most of £11m unpaid Man...

7 Nov 2024

Care assistant unfairly dismissed following murder charge

2 Aug 2024

HR legal opinion: why the BBC continued to...

1 Aug 2024

How HR mentors are rebuilding confidence among ex-offenders

16 Jul 2024

KPMG urges others to hire ex-offenders after pilot

24 Apr 2024

Automated police vetting system being explored

15 Apr 2024

Stigma putting construction firms off hiring ex-offenders

15 Mar 2024

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+