Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Case lawEmployment lawDismissal

Pacitti Jones v O’Brien

by Personnel Today 1 Jan 2006
by Personnel Today 1 Jan 2006


Pacitti Jones v O’Brien

The Court of Session confirms that the dates on which employment starts and ends must be counted when calculating continuous service for the purposes of an unfair dismissal claim.

Ms O’Brien started work for Pacitti Jones on 8 April 2002. She was given one week’s written notice by a letter posted by hand to her home on 27 March 2003 (while she was away on holiday) which she did not receive until Monday 31 March 2003.

O’Brien brought a claim for unfair dismissal. The tribunal decided that O’Brien did not have one year’s continuity of employment and so could not bring her claim. It considered that O’Brien’s period of notice had begun on Friday 28 March 2003 and had expired on Thursday 3 April 2003.

The EAT overturned the decision and stated that the start date of the notice period was 1 April 2003 and the end date was 7 April 2003, meaning O’Brien’s claim was admissible.

Pacitti Jones appealed to the Court of Session arguing that one year’s continuous service would not be accrued until 8 April 2003. The Court of Session disagreed, holding that section 211(1)(a) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 expressly states that the first day of work and the effective date of termination must be included in the calculation and on that basis, O’Brien had a year’s continuous service and her claim was in time.

Key points

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Both the first and last date of employment must be counted when calculating continuous employment.

Notice will begin to run when the employee knows that they are going to be dismissed, not from the date on which the letter terminating the employment is delivered at their address (McMaster v Manchester Airport plc).

What you should do



  • The method of calculating time periods for bringing and responding to employment claims varies. Always check the relevant provisions first and do not make assumptions
  • Take care when considering dismissing an employee shortly before the date on which they have one year’s continuous service (and therefore acquire unfair dismissal rights)
  • Include a notice provision in the contract of employment, stating when notice of termination under the contract is deemed to have been served.

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Female mechanic sues Network Rail for sex discrimination
next post
Hutton pushes case for incapacity benefit reform

You may also like

Decision to sack man for Michael Jackson noises...

29 Aug 2025

P&O Ferries boss who steered 800 sackings steps...

29 Aug 2025

Council clerk sacked after trying to ensure his...

29 Aug 2025

Day one rights in the Employment Rights Bill...

28 Aug 2025

EHRC acts on policies flouting law on single-sex...

28 Aug 2025

Acas to explore use of AI as half...

27 Aug 2025

Royal Mail eCourier drivers bring legal claim over...

26 Aug 2025

Lidl enters agreement with EHRC to prevent sexual...

22 Aug 2025

X settles severance claims of former Twitter employees

22 Aug 2025

Midwife files belief claim after Trust reported social...

20 Aug 2025

  • Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain with centred ergonomics SPONSORED | If you often notice...Read more
  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise