Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Latest NewsIndirect discriminationPregnancy and maternity discrimination

Removing pregnant police officer from front line was discrimination

by Ashleigh Webber 18 Mar 2019
by Ashleigh Webber 18 Mar 2019

A case where a pregnant police officer was taken away from front line duties and placed in a desk-based role was pregnancy discrimination and indirect discrimination, an employment tribunal has found.

Mrs Town was a police constable in the response team at Devon and Cornwall Police. In November 2017 she informed her line manager that she was pregnant and wanted to remain in her front line role until she went on maternity leave, although she accepted she would have to do so with reduced responsibilities.

Pregnancy discrimination

What is direct pregnancy and maternity discrimination?

How to manage an employee who is absent due to sickness during pregnancy

A risk assessment confirmed she was fit to remain in her role but with adjustments including wearing plain clothes, working fewer night shifts and undertaking lower-risk work such as interviewing witnesses.

However, a meeting of the constabulary’s “people management group” a week later decided that Mrs Town would begin working in the Crime Management Hub – an office-based department that dealt with low-level crime – at the 12-week stage of her pregnancy.

Mrs Town was informed about the decision a couple of weeks later and was told that it was in line with “business need” and because of her restricted duties.

The onset of anxiety and depression led her to go on sick leave from 22 December 2017 and returned to work in the Crime Management Hub on 9 February.

Her GP and midwife claimed that her ill-health was brought on by the decision to move her to the Crime Management Hub. She had wanted to remain with her colleagues in the response team because they had supported her through a miscarriage in early 2017.

When she returned to work in February, she was able to carry out her new role from a desk in the response team’s office. A further risk assessment found that she was suffering from stress, anxiety and stress-related migraines because she had been moved to the new role against her wishes.

She returned to the response team in May 2018 until she went on maternity leave in July, but also had to deal with “overflow” work from the Crime Management Hub.

At an employment tribunal in December, Devon and Cornwall Police maintained Mrs Town’s pregnancy was not the reason for her change of role .

However, the tribunal found that she had received unfavourable treatment on the ground of pregnancy and said that any other conclusion “would have had an air of artificiality about it”.

Employment judge David Harris said the decision had put Mrs Town at a disadvantage, had put her mental health at risk, and had ignored the risk assessment that was carried out when she announced her pregnancy.

“It removed her from a working environment that she found particularly supportive, against the background of the miscarriage that she had recently suffered, and removed her from work that she valued and enjoyed. Indeed, it was the very work that the claimant had joined the police to be able to do,” the judgment says.

It found that the police force had “lost sight” of the fact that she was pregnant in its decision-making process and viewed her “simply as a person with certain physical restrictions”.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The judgment adds that pregnant women were particularly disadvantaged by the police force’s policy that a person on restricted duties beyond two weeks would be considered for transfer to desk-based roles.

A hearing to determine whether costs should be awarded is to take place at a later date.

Ashleigh Webber

Ashleigh is a former editor of OHW+ and former HR and wellbeing editor at Personnel Today. Ashleigh's areas of interest include employee health and wellbeing, equality and inclusion and skills development. She has hosted many webinars for Personnel Today, on topics including employee retention, financial wellbeing and menopause support.

previous post
‘Business lacks transparency over parental support’
next post
April 2019 employment law changes: Seven things for HR to do

You may also like

Consultation launched after Supreme Court ‘sex’ ruling

20 May 2025

M&S unfairly dismissed pregnant bakery worker

29 Apr 2025

Recruiter who returned to empty office after maternity...

23 Apr 2025

Former Citibank employee settles sex discrimination case

28 Mar 2025

Up to 74,000 women forced out of work...

27 Feb 2025

Property consultant with morning sickness awarded £94k after...

18 Feb 2025

Mothercare discriminated against employee on maternity leave

16 Dec 2024

Administrator sacked for maternity leave pregnancy wins £29,000

28 Oct 2024

EHRC opens consultation on updated code of practice

2 Oct 2024

‘Emotional’ pregnant Mitie manager wins £350k in compensation...

11 Sep 2024

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+