Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Positive discrimination

Positive discrimination

by Personnel Today 9 Jan 2001
by Personnel Today 9 Jan 2001

UK law is generally hostile towards positive discrimination practices. There is little prospect of any positive discrimination measures being made lawful in the near future, although the Government is currently considering allowing such measures in the selection of political candidates. However, even the Labour party was defeated in an employment tribunal for imposing women-only shortlists for selection of parliamentary candidates.


“Positive action” in UK law


There are, however, a number of exceptions to the general principle against positive discrimination. These are referred to in the legislation as “positive action”.


  • The Sex Discrimination Act 1975 and the Race Relations Act 1976 allow positive action in training individuals who are job applicants or other non-employees, where it reasonably appears that during the preceding 12 months there were either no persons or a comparatively small number of persons of one sex or a racial group doing that particular work in Great Britain. In such situations it is lawful to give persons of that sex or race training for that work or to encourage them to take advantage of opportunities for doing that work.

  • Trade unions, employee associations and professional trade organisations can give preferential treatment to members of one sex or race in training them for internal posts in the organisation and encouraging them to apply for such posts. Again, they must show that in the preceding 12 months there were either no members or a comparatively small number of members of that sex or race holding such posts. These organisations can also embark upon recruitment campaigns aimed at one sex or race, providing that the same 12-month qualifying condition applies.

  • The “genuine occupational qualification” rules allow employers to target one race or sex for particular jobs in certain limited circumstances.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Equal Treatment Directive


One of the main curbs on any positive discrimination laws in the UK is the Equal Treatment Directive. The ECJ took a fairly strict line in the Kalanke case, 1996, ICR 314, and declared that any positive action which effectively guaranteed a female candidate the position in question where a male was equally qualified, was unlawful. However, in the later case of Marschall, 1998, IRLR 29, the ECJ showed a more relaxed approach to such practices within public sector bodies. It is possible therefore for the Government to adopt a similar practice in the public sector and allow positive discrimination between two candidates where one candidate comes from an under-represented group, provided that it does not absolutely guarantee that in the circumstances that person would get the job.

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
DTI awards £50,000 to Thames Water-trade union partnership
next post
How Naafi and MSF resolve disputes outside tribunals

You may also like

Trump ‘restores’ meritocracy by eroding discrimination protections

25 Apr 2025

West Yorkshire Police denies positive discrimination accusations

10 Apr 2025

Thames Valley Police ‘positive discrimination’ led to ‘divided...

4 Apr 2025

President Trump links DEI policy with fatal air...

31 Jan 2025

President Trump’s DEI backlash: should HR be worried?

24 Jan 2025

Apple urges shareholders to reject diversity rollback proposal

13 Jan 2025

White police officers overlooked for promotion win race...

13 Aug 2024

Kemi Badenoch: ‘confused HR colleagues’ misunderstand Equality Act

31 Jul 2023

Government publishes ethnicity pay gap reporting guidance

17 Apr 2023

What’s the difference between positive action and positive...

20 Jan 2023

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+