Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Employment lawLatest NewsRedundancy

Redundancy pay increase plans could lead to more job cuts

by Louisa Peacock 12 Mar 2009
by Louisa Peacock 12 Mar 2009

Plans to increase redundancy pay to help workers laid off because of the recession would only result in company closures and more job losses, according to employers’ groups.


The Statutory Redundancy Payment (Amendment) Bill will reach its second reading in parliament today (Friday 13 March), proposing to increase the maximum week’s pay used to calculate statutory redundancy pay by 43%, from £350 to £500.


Business groups attacked the private members’ Bill, stating it would hinder particularly small businesses in the current climate.


Phil Orford, chief executive of the Forum of Private Business, said: “The proposal, apparently to protect workers, is misguided because it would increase unemployment by forcing many businesses to close that might have survived had statutory redundancy pay been left alone.”


Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Meanwhile, manufacturers’ body the EEF warned the Bill would disproportionately affect the industry as it generally offered higher rates of pay than other sectors. David Yeandle, head of employment policy, added: “This Bill seems to be at variance with the government’s policy of ‘protecting vulnerable workers, supporting good employers’.”


The Bill, brought by Lindsay Hoyle MP, is supported by the country’s major unions. Hoyle said: “Today, workers are very much facing hard times again, but state redundancy pay is so out of step with average earnings it acts as a ceiling for workers, not a floor to protect them.”

Louisa Peacock

previous post
New immigration rules may have little impact on numbers of migrant staff
next post
Fire Service equality targets will have little effect

You may also like

Security manager at BBC unfairly dismissed after ‘misusing’...

21 Aug 2025

Reasonable adjustment failures for epilepsy lead to £445k...

21 Aug 2025

Rise in number of Neets reverses trend from...

21 Aug 2025

RMT announces week-long Tube strikes

21 Aug 2025

Gender pension gap means women stop receiving pension...

21 Aug 2025

New M&S warehouse to create 1,000 permanent jobs

21 Aug 2025

Employee Benefits Live 2025 conference programme unveiled

21 Aug 2025

Council defends suggested alternatives to ‘husband’ and ‘wife’

21 Aug 2025

Midwife files belief claim after Trust reported social...

20 Aug 2025

‘Noisy and boisterous’ younger colleagues not age-related harassment

20 Aug 2025

  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise