Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Redundancy

by Hannah Vickery 3 Nov 2013
by Hannah Vickery 3 Nov 2013
civil service jobs
  • Civil Service
  • Economics, government & business
  • Latest News

Prime minister steps up calls for 90,000 civil service job cuts

by Jo Faragher
13 May 2022
Boris Johnson is reported to have told ministers at an away day that they must return civil servant numbers to those of 2016, reducing overall headcount by a fifth overall.
queen's speech employment bill 2022
  • Zero hours
  • Neonatal leave
  • Gig economy

Queen’s Speech: absence of employment bill leaves organisations in limbo

by Ashleigh Webber
10 May 2022

The government has been accused of breaking its promises to improve workers’ rights, as the employment bill was excluded from...

morrisons rescues McColl's
  • Collective redundancy
  • Insolvency
  • Latest News

Morrisons saves 16,000 jobs with McColl’s rescue deal

by Ashleigh Webber
10 May 2022

Morrisons has rescued convenience retailer McColl's from administration, saving 16,000 jobs.

  • Collective redundancy
  • Latest News
  • Employment law

A dark day for workers’ rights – why the P&O Ferries saga must not happen again

by Neil Todd
29 Apr 2022

What does the P&O Ferries saga tell us about the rights of workers on and offshore in the UK?

Dover docks P&O Ferries - minimum wage ferries
  • Collective redundancy
  • Latest News
  • Employment law

P&O Ferries told to return £11m furlough money as sailings resume

by Adam McCulloch
28 Apr 2022

Transport secretary Grant Shapps calls on P&O Ferries chief executive to resign but first to return furlough cash.

Pride of Kent vessel
  • Collective redundancy
  • Latest News
  • Minimum wage

Government must take over P&O Ferries services, demands TUC

by Adam McCulloch
15 Apr 2022

Union leaders have called on ministers to assume control of P&O Ferries’ passenger and freight services in the light of multiple safety failures.

People leaving offices at night
  • Collective redundancy
  • Latest News
  • Job creation and losses

Planned redundancies rise 103% in one month

by Adam McCulloch
11 Apr 2022

Insolvency Service data on planned redundancies record large jump in February 2022.

Southampton docks
  • Collective redundancy
  • Latest News
  • Redundancy

P&O Ferries: owner DP World pulls out of freeport scheme

by Adam McCulloch
8 Apr 2022

P&O Ferries owner DP World has withdrawn from the leadership team of a freeport project because of political pressure stemming from the P&O Ferries redundancies.

P&O Ferries tribunal
  • Collective redundancy
  • Latest News
  • Race discrimination

P&O Ferries chef launches unfair dismissal and discrimination claim

by Ashleigh Webber
6 Apr 2022

A former P&O Ferries chef is taking the company to an employment tribunal, claiming unfair dismissal, racial discrimination and harassment.

P&O Ferries Pride of Kent ship in Calais
  • Civil Service
  • Collective redundancy
  • Latest News

Insolvency Service launches criminal probe into P&O Ferries sackings

by Adam McCulloch
1 Apr 2022

At the request of ministers the Insolvency Service has begun criminal and civil investigations into the P&O Ferries redundancies.

Grant Shapps met with GP World in Dubai
  • Collective redundancy
  • Latest News
  • Employment law

Ministers withdraw legal threat over P&O Ferries redundancies

by Adam McCulloch
1 Apr 2022

The Nautilus Union: ‘P&O has gotten away with it. There’s no fine, there’s no legal action, there’s only words and hot air.’

Dover docks P&O Ferries - minimum wage ferries
  • Collective redundancy
  • Latest News
  • Information & consultation

P&O Ferries: Grant Shapps’ minimum wage plan dismissed

by Adam McCulloch
31 Mar 2022

The government's plan to ask UK ports to block ferries from docking if they do no pay crews the UK minimum wage would not succeed, the docks industry has stated.

Postbox Royal Mail with snow on top
  • Collective redundancy
  • Economics, government & business
  • Latest News

Fire and rehire: Royal Mail faces threat of industrial action

by Adam McCulloch
31 Mar 2022

Unite threatens Royal Mail with industrial action over what it claims is a ‘fire and rehire’ scheme to replace managers.

View more

Avatar
Hannah Vickery

previous post
HR Tech
next post
Maternity & Paternity
Legal Q&AEmployment lawRedundancy

Redundancy

by Personnel Today 21 Jun 2005
by Personnel Today 21 Jun 2005

Do the collective consultation obligations apply in relation to staff who accept voluntary redundancy?

Yes. In Scotch Premier Meat Ltd v Burns and others [2000] IRLR 639 EAT, the employer argued that employees who had accepted voluntary packages were not entitled to a protective award because they had not been dismissed in law.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in Scotland held that “where the whole background to the departure was determination by the employer to close a factory and make the employees inevitably redundant, the fact that some employees accepted a package as the means of effecting that decision does not in our opinion preclude a finding that there was a dismissal”.

The EAT agreed with the tribunal that the employer had called for volunteers in an attempt to avoid the duty to consult, and held that the terminations had not been mutually agreed.

Does an employee have the right to be accompanied at an ‘at risk’ meeting?

A Under the Employment Relations Act 1999, section 10, workers have the right to be accompanied by a trade union official or a fellow worker at a disciplinary or grievance hearing.

A ‘disciplinary hearing’ is defined as a hearing that could result in a formal warning, the taking of some other action – such as dismissal – or the confirmation of a warning or some other action taken.

The standard statutory dismissal and disciplinary procedure applies to most redundancies that the collective consultation requirements do not apply to.

The Employment Act 2002, schedule 2, part 4, provides that a meeting held under the statutory dispute resolution procedures is a ‘hearing’ for the purposes of the statutory right to be accompanied.

However, for the statutory right to be accompanied under the Employment Relations Act 1999, the meeting must not only be a hearing, but also a ‘disciplinary’ or ‘grievance’ hearing. It does not therefore automatically follow that an employee has the statutory right to be accompanied at a redundancy meeting held under the statutory dismissal and disciplinary procedure.

This interpretation is consistent with the EAT’s reasoning in Heathmill Multimedia ASP Ltd v Jones and Jones [2003] IRLR 856 EAT. Jones and his brother were called to a meeting in December 2001, and given one month’s notice of dismissal.

An employment tribunal held that the reason for dismissal was redundancy, and that it had not therefore been appropriate to follow the disciplinary route in dealing with the matter. However, it held that the meeting had been a ‘disciplinary’ hearing within the meaning of the Employment Relations Act 1999, section 10.

On appeal, the company argued that the meeting had not been a disciplinary hearing. The EAT upheld the appeal, and said that when the meeting’s purpose is merely to inform an employee that they are to be dismissed by reason of redundancy, it is not a disciplinary hearing within the meaning of the Employment Relations Act 1999, since the action being taken is not disciplinary in nature.

If the reasoning outlined in Heathmill is correct, then an employee does not have the statutory right to be accompanied at a meeting held under the statutory dismissal and disciplinary procedure where the employer is contemplating dismissal on the grounds of redundancy.

There are, however, technical arguments that could be had about the correct interpretation of section 10, so the safest option is to allow employees to be accompanied at such meetings. This is also best practice, and helps to ensure a fair process.

Do the Information and Consultation of Employees Regulations 2004 have any impact on the duty to consult collectively?

The Information and Consultation of Employees Regulations 2004 apply to undertakings with 150 or more employees from 6 April 2005, those with 100 or more from 6 April 2007, and those with 50 or more from 6 April 2008.

Employers do not have to set up information and consultation arrangements under the regulations unless they receive a valid request from employees, or they wish to do so themselves.

As a general rule, the regulations will not affect an employer’s obligation to consult collectively under the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.

However, the regulations make it clear that where employers are subject to the fallback information and consultation provisions, and are also obliged to inform and consult under the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, they will be relieved of their obligation to inform and consult under the regulations.

In these circumstances, the employer will simply be required to inform the information and consultation representatives in writing that it will be consulting under the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.

The DTI’s guidance on the regulations suggests that employers with a negotiated or pre-existing agreement may wish to include a similar provision in their agreement, so as to avoid being subject to different legal requirements to inform and consult about the same matter.



Avatar
Personnel Today

previous post
University woos women to IT with games course
next post
The cost of jury service

You may also like

One in five employers planning ‘no jab no...

19 May 2022

MP demands timeline on carer’s leave legislation

13 May 2022

Prime minister steps up calls for 90,000 civil...

13 May 2022

Queen’s Speech: absence of employment bill leaves organisations...

10 May 2022

Morrisons saves 16,000 jobs with McColl’s rescue deal

10 May 2022

Queen’s Speech: Exclusivity contracts for low-paid workers to...

9 May 2022

MP seeks legal protections for employees undergoing fertility...

9 May 2022

PwC staff to benefit from extended summer hours...

5 May 2022

A dark day for workers’ rights – why...

29 Apr 2022

P&O Ferries told to return £11m furlough money...

28 Apr 2022
  • Apprenticeships are the solution to your recruitment problems PROMOTED | Apprenticeships have the pulling power...Read more
  • What it really means to be mentally fit PROMOTED | What is mental fitness...Read more
  • How music can help to ease anxiety at work PROMOTED | A lot has happened since March 2020, hasn’t it?...Read more
  • Why now is the time to plug the unhealthy gap PROMOTED | We’ve all heard the term ‘health is wealth’...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+