Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Retirement laws needed to stem tide of tribunals

by Personnel Today 3 Dec 2002
by Personnel Today 3 Dec 2002

The
Government would be wise to speed up the introduction of age discrimination
legislation to put an end to the uncertainty

The
Government would be wise to speed up the introduction of age discrimination
legislation to remove uncertainty and reduce the ever-growing number of
tribunals.

It
comes as no surprise that the recent employment tribunal ruling allowing
employees over the age of 65 to bring claims for unfair dismissal and statutory
redundancy is to be appealed.

The
Government clearly believes that, despite what the Labour Force Statistics
suggest, the upper age limit for employment claims is not discriminatory.

However,
some may have been surprised to read these words from a Government
spokesperson: "Some issues are already clear. We must erode the present
cliff edge at the end of working life – where on Friday someone is a valued
member of the workforce, but by Monday they are shunted into retirement. This
will mean extending choice and removing financial penalties that stand in people’s
way. And it will mean legislating to end age discrimination at work."

These
were the words of the Work and Pensions Secretary Andrew Smith at the Labour
Party Conference – but the subject matter was not compulsory retirement age,
rather separate legislation concerning pension reforms.

Inland
Revenue regulations are to be reformed, opening up the possibility of easier
retention when an employee has reached retirement age. Easier, that is, for the
employer to persuade staff to stay on.

The
current Inland Revenue regulations prevent employees from taking a pension and
salary from the same employer unless a completely different job is taken.

As
a result, employees find they are unable to wind down to part-time work and
stay with the same company purely because of financial difficulties. The
changes to the pension restrictions will remove these financial barriers. This
will clearly benefit employers who wish to retain older workers who have key
roles in the company, and might otherwise be lost to competitors.

This
might be misinterpreted as the Government’s first step in introducing
legislation giving older workers more rights. However, whether the employee is
invited to stay on after retirement age is the employer’s choice. An employee
doesn’t have the right to complain if they are not retained. But legislation
introducing real rights for older workers is definitely in the pipeline.

Implementation
of the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations must take place before December
2006. Although the first draft has not yet been published, it appears likely it
will be unlawful for an employer to stipulate a compulsory retirement age that
cannot be justified by the needs of the particular job.

In
the current situation, the Stratford Employment Tribunal’s decision is persuasive,
but it does not change the law.

Law
books still state that an employee over 65 years old or at normal retirement
age, will not be able to bring a claim against their employer. Yet employees
are bringing claims on the back of this decision and these claims are being
stayed pending the appeal being heard.

Every
time an employee is retired, there is a risk that they may present a complaint
of unfair dismissal. Employers either have to follow a full dismissal procedure
and identify a fair reason for dismissal, or bite the bullet and see whether
they submit a claim.

This
uncertainty could be quickly addressed by the introduction of new legislation.
Everybody knows that age discrimination laws must come into force. Delay now
means that employers are left in limbo and the tribunals lists are getting
longer.

Yes,
there are practical difficulties in introducing age discrimination regulations.
But there must also have been difficulties introducing similar legislation
outlawing race, sex and disability discrimination.

It
will take time for employers to become accustomed to age discrimination
legislation, and it is likely that for many, an inability to recognise it as a
serious issue will result in costly claims and potentially large compensation
awards.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

However,
the benefit will be a return to certainty – which has got to be in everybody’s
best interests.

By
Michael Ball, Employment partner, Halliwell Landau

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Defined contributions pensions push up cost to employees
next post
Flexible working rules are ‘existing practice’

You may also like

Why we need to rethink soft skills in...

1 Jul 2025

Five misconceptions about hiring refugees

20 Jun 2025

Forward features list 2025 – submitting content to...

23 Nov 2024

Features list 2021 – submitting content to Personnel...

1 Sep 2020

Large firms have no plans to bring all...

26 Aug 2020

A typical work-from-home lunch: crisps

24 Aug 2020

Occupational health on the coronavirus frontline – ‘I...

21 Aug 2020

Occupational Health & Wellbeing research round-up: August 2020

7 Aug 2020

Acas: Redundancy related enquiries surge 160%

5 Aug 2020

Coronavirus: lockdown ‘phase two’ may bring added headaches...

17 Jul 2020

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+