Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Zero hoursEmployment contracts

Scope of employment legislation to extend?

by Personnel Today 18 Jun 2002
by Personnel Today 18 Jun 2002

Leaked reports of workplace laws shake-up refer to staff being able to claim
greater compensation and claim it sooner

According to details of a proposed consultation paper leaked to The Times
earlier this week, the Government looks set to significantly increase the scope
of primary employment legislation later this year. This is despite the fact
that some of the legislation being reviewed has been in force for less than
three years.

The DTI has stated that details reported by The Times cannot be seen as
definitive, but reports seem to suggest proposed changes will include the
removal of the requirement for employees to have at least one year’s service
before they are entitled to claim unfair dismissal. The maximum limit for
unfair dismissal compensation, which currently stands at £52,600, will also be
increased.

Employment tribunals may be given increased powers to reinstate unfairly
dismissed employees. In addition, the threshold for application of the
statutory union recognition procedure (which currently only applies to employers
with 21 or more employees) will be lowered.

Lastly, the Government looks set to abolish the ‘zero hours’ contracts,
where an employer can call upon individuals to perform services at any time,
but which does not require them to pay those individuals when their services
are not required.

Obviously at this stage the proposals are unconfirmed and likely to be
amended in some way. If they do go ahead, rights for employees, both
individually and collectively, will be dramatically extended in the workplace.
And the significant burden of employment legislation already faced by employers
will be increased.

Predictably, trade unions have welcomed this news. Employers’
representatives on the other hand, have expressed serious concern – the CBI has
already branded the planned review as "totally inappropriate".

Likely effects of changes

It goes without saying that the proposed abolition of the requirement that
an employee must have at least one year’s service to claim unfair dismissal
will almost certainly prompt an increase in applications to employment
tribunals. However, many believe that, ultimately, the Government will yield to
pressure from employers’ organisations and leave a six-month qualifying period
in place at least. However, this will still be a cause for concern for
employers as tribunal applications have already increased significantly in
recent years and the lowering of the qualifying period will increase this
burden.

The proposed increase in the £52,600 cap on compensation for unfair
dismissal is unlikely to have an impact in the majority of cases. However,
depending upon the level by which the cap is increased, it may encourage more
high-earning employees to bring claims in employment tribunals. Currently, if
an employee’s claim for unfair dismissal is judged to be worth more than
£52,600, their only option is to pursue the excess through issuing separate
proceedings in the High Court, which is a far more complex and costly
procedure.

The proposed legislation should also be looked at in the light of the
statutory union recognition procedure. This has now been in place for some time
and has not, as yet, produced the plethora of demands for recognition predicted
on its implementation. Trade unions have been careful to focus their efforts
and limited resources on specific companies and sectors. However, the reduction
in the threshold may mean very small employers are faced with a surprise demand
from organised employees who gain union support.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

If the proposed changes proceed, they will constitute major changes to some
of the principal elements of existing employment legislation. While employees’
organisations no doubt await confirmation of the proposed changes and start of
the consultation process with baited breath, it is likely employers view it, at
best, with resignation. So we suggest any views on the proposed changes be
passed to the DTI at the appropriate time.

By Sarah Keeble, a partner in the Olswang employment department

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
E-mail surveillance plans put on hold
next post
Employees not impressed by work-life balance schemes

You may also like

Government publishes ‘roadmap’ for Employment Rights Bill

1 Jul 2025

Graduate jobs this summer ‘will be toughest since...

25 Jun 2025

Employee ownership rockets in past decade

25 Jun 2025

Lawyers warn over impact of Employment Rights Bill...

13 Jun 2025

Institute of Directors demand reforms to Employment Rights...

6 Jun 2025

Top 10 HR questions May 2025: Failure to...

2 Jun 2025

Bank holidays: six things employers need to know

23 May 2025

Fire and rehire: the relocation question

22 May 2025

CBI chair Soames accuses ministers of not listening...

16 May 2025

Zero-hours workers’ rights to be extended from beyond...

8 May 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+