Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Case lawBelief discriminationLatest News

Supporting Glasgow Rangers is not a philosophical belief, finds tribunal

by Ashleigh Webber 8 Sep 2022
by Ashleigh Webber 8 Sep 2022 Mr McClung claimed supporting Glasgow Rangers Football Club was a philosophical belief
Thomas Gilfeather / Shutterstock.com
Mr McClung claimed supporting Glasgow Rangers Football Club was a philosophical belief
Thomas Gilfeather / Shutterstock.com

Supporting a particular football team cannot be considered a philosophical belief worthy of protection under the Equality Act, an employment tribunal has ruled.

Mr McClung, a lifelong supporter of Glasgow Rangers Football Club, brought a claim for unfair dismissal and discrimination because of religion or belief against Doosan Babcock, a company that provides construction and servicing in the energy sector, and recruitment consultancy NRL.

The claimant, a subcontractor, carried out work for Doosan Babcock via NRL between January and June 2019. He alleged that a manager, who was a Celtic fan, did not offer him later work due to his support of the rival Glasgow team.

McClung claimed that his support of Rangers was so strong and such an intrinsic part of his existence that it was akin to a philosophical belief.

He has supported the team for 42 years and spends most of his disposable income on attending games, considering his support for the team a “massive” part of his life that has created memories with his father and son. He receives a birthday card from the football club each year.

He told the tribunal hearing in June that supporting Rangers is a way of life and it was as important to him as it was for Christians to attend church.

Philosophical belief

Maya Forstater wins belief discrimination case over gender-critical views

Landmark ruling: ethical veganism is a philosophical belief

Discrimination because of protected beliefs: what do employers need to know?

He added that he supported some of the philosophies that came with being a Rangers fan, including allegiance to the Queen, support for the UK union, support for Northern Ireland to remain part of the UK and some involvement in the Orange Order or attending marches.

Doosan Babcock’s lawyer acknowledged that McClung was clearly a devoted fan, but argued that supporting Rangers was merely “support” and not a philosophical belief. She claimed that supporting a football team should be treated in a manner similar to the support of a political party.

In making its decision, the tribunal panel considered the legal test for philosophical belief that was set out in the Nicholson v Grainger case. To meet this threshold, a person’s belief must be genuinely held; not an opinion or viewpoint; must be a substantial aspect of human life and behaviour; must have a certain level of cogency, seriousness, cohesion and importance; and must be worthy of respect in a democratic society and must not conflict with the fundamental rights of others.

It found that McClung’s support for Rangers did not meet the second, third, fourth or fifth criteria. However, it agreed his support for the team was genuinely held.

In her judgment, Employment Judge Lusy Wiseman said: “I considered support for a football club to be akin to a lifestyle choice, rather than relating to a substantial aspect of human life and behaviour.

“Support for Rangers Football Club does not amount to a philosophical belief within the meaning of section 10(2) of the Equality Act 2010, and cannot be relied upon by the claimant as a protected characteristic for the purposes of claiming discrimination under the Equality Act.”

Since McClung was a subcontractor, his unfair dismissal claim was rejected at a preliminary hearing last year.

McClung told the Daily Record that he would appeal the decision in his philosophical belief claim.

Kate Palmer, HR advice and consultancy director at HR support service Peninsula, said that despite the ruling, employers should ensure they treat all workers equally, regardless of any personal attributes, to avoid the risks of tribunal claims.

“There’s been a long list of claims for protection under the philosophical belief argument. Ethical veganism, spiritualism, Scottish independence, and a belief in never lying are all considered philosophical beliefs, but the employment tribunal has found that being a Rangers fan is not,” she said.

“The tribunal found that while Mr McClung is a genuine Rangers fan, it should be classed as support and a lifestyle choice rather than a belief. The judge ruled that the ways in which the claimant manifested being a fan were all matters personal to him, i.e. they are subjectively important and not necessarily important to the masses.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

“The judge also said that while support of Rangers is worthy of respect in a democratic society, it does not reach the level required to be a protected belief in same way as religion.”

Latest HR job opportunities on Personnel Today


Browse more human resources jobs

Ashleigh Webber

Ashleigh is a former editor of OHW+ and former HR and wellbeing editor at Personnel Today. Ashleigh's areas of interest include employee health and wellbeing, equality and inclusion and skills development. She has hosted many webinars for Personnel Today, on topics including employee retention, financial wellbeing and menopause support.

previous post
Suspending employees: Key HR questions
next post
Illness and fewer part-time jobs see drop in over 50s in work

You may also like

Darlington nurses’ changing room case delayed to October

3 Apr 2025

University of Sussex attacks Kathleen Stock freedom of...

27 Mar 2025

DSTL scientist constructively dismissed for gender-critical views

24 Mar 2025

EDI should not stifle LGB rights in the...

4 Mar 2025

Higgs’ victory has ‘profound’ implications for employers

12 Feb 2025

LGB Alliance launches Business Forum to ‘restore’ gay...

5 Feb 2025

Employment Rights Bill: EHRC warns MPs of ‘cumulative’...

14 Jan 2025

Darlington nurses gain Conservative support over single-sex spaces

3 Dec 2024

Rape crisis worker dismissed over gender-critical views awarded...

7 Nov 2024

Nurses meet Wes Streeting over single-sex changing rooms

28 Oct 2024

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+