Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Gig economyEmployment contractsFreelance workers

What can we expect from the Supreme Court in the Pimlico Plumbers case?

by Darren Newman 31 Aug 2017
by Darren Newman 31 Aug 2017 Photocritical / Shutterstock
Photocritical / Shutterstock

Consultant editor Darren Newman expresses surprise that Pimlico Plumbers was granted permission to appeal to the Supreme Court in a case concerning the “worker” or otherwise status of a self-employed plumber – and asks which particular issues the Court might consider.

To my mind, the most surprising thing the Supreme Court has done this year is to give permission to appeal in the case of Pimlico Plumbers Ltd and another v Smith. This is the case involving – as you might expect – a plumber, Mr Smith, who was engaged as an “independent contractor”. He brought a range of claims including unfair dismissal, disability discrimination and entitlement to holiday pay.

No one doubts the importance of the point at issue here – but I am surprised that the Court was persuaded that Pimlico Plumbers had an arguable case”

The tribunal found that he was not an employee for the purposes of claiming unfair dismissal and that question is no longer in issue. What is being challenged in the Supreme Court is the Court of Appeal’s decision to uphold the finding that he was nevertheless “in employment” for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010 and was a worker for the purposes of the right to paid annual leave.

The Supreme Court does not hear an appeal from just anyone who happens to be unhappy with a decision of the Court of Appeal. To get permission to appeal one has to have an arguable point of law that is of “general public importance”. No one doubts the importance of the point at issue here – but I am surprised that the Court was persuaded that Pimlico Plumbers had an arguable case. The decision of the Court of Appeal attracted a lot of publicity, but did not strike me as legally groundbreaking – it seemed to turn very much on its own particular facts. Nevertheless the Supreme Court has obviously been persuaded that there is an issue here that it wants to weigh in on.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Continue reading the full article on XpertHR

relx_copyright – This article is Brightmine content – Copyright 2024 LexisNexis Risk Solutions

Darren Newman

Darren Newman qualified as a barrister in 1990, and has represented both employers and employees at tribunal. He provides straightforward practical guidance on a wide range of employment law issues. Darren also works as a consultant editor for XpertHR.

previous post
Long hours put workers at risk of irregular heartbeat
next post
Occupational health research round-up: September 2017

You may also like

Zero-hours workers’ rights to be extended from beyond...

8 May 2025

How can businesses build protections for gig workers?

7 May 2025

Bank holidays: six things employers need to know

2 May 2025

Employment Rights Bill must be tightened to protect...

1 May 2025

Uber drivers experience ‘false autonomy’ over work

16 Apr 2025

Home Office reveals employers’ costly right-to-work mistakes

7 Apr 2025

New right to work checks put onus on...

3 Apr 2025

Court of Appeal hears Ryanair pilot’s worker status...

1 Apr 2025

Working when the clocks go forward: how should...

30 Mar 2025

How should employers navigate IR35 in the supply...

10 Mar 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+