Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

The HR Scorecard

by Personnel Today 11 Sep 2001
by Personnel Today 11 Sep 2001

The HR Scorecard

What is it?

The HR Scorecard is the latest offering from academics to the HR performance
measurement and management pot. Like other tools before it, the Scorecard is intended
as an easy way for HR teams to measure the effects of their policies on the
organisation’s financial performance. Devised by three academics after studying
nearly 3,000 firms, the Scorecard is described as a "roadmap designed to
embed human resources systems within a company’s overall strategy and manage
the human resources architecture as a strategic asset".

The Scorecard process involves six steps:

– Clearly defining business strategy

– Building a business case for HR as a strategic asset

– Identifying HR deliverables within the strategy map

– Aligning HR architecture to HR deliverables

– Designing the strategic HR measurement system

– Implementing management by measurement.

The story so far

IT expert David Norton and Harvard Business School professor Robert Kaplan
created the original Balanced Scorecard – the management tool that led to the
HR Scorecard. The Balanced Scorecard came into circulation around 1993.

The HR Scorecard was developed by academics Brian Becker, Mark Huselid and
Dave Ulrich and was unveiled to the world this year.

The concept of the importance of setting targets, measuring HR activities
and linking them to company strategy is not new. But too often one department’s
targets clash with another’s. The idea of seeking balance between the different
organisational facets was highlighted in the Sears Roebuck case in the early
1990s – used as an example in the HR Scorecard book. The US store illustrated
how looking after its employees resulted in happier clients and shareholders.

With increasing pressure on HR to justify its worth to the board, the search
for the Holy Grail in HR accountability has been around for some time. It has
led to a flourish of benchmarking exercises and HR measurement tools, of which
the HR Scorecard is the latest.

Kaplan and Norton’s Balanced Scorecard aims to try to prevent organisations
designing conflicting measures. It puts forward a range of measures designed to
work in harmony, approaching performance measurement from four perspectives:
financial, customer satisfaction, internal efficiency and effectiveness, and
learning and innovation (HR and people-related issues).

But the Balanced Scorecard was criticised as having too little emphasis on
the human element – hence the HR Scorecard.

The promise

Becker, Huselid and Ulrich claim that the Scorecard enables organisations to
link the results of HR policies to measures such as profitability and
shareholder values – measures that are understood and respected by line
managers and senior executives.

The HR Scorecard promises to help the organisation successfully implement
change in a straightforward way. Likely outcomes are claimed to be:

– Better allocation of time and money spent on human resources

– A higher probability of implementing the firm’s overall strategy

– More productive and committed employees

– A more competitive organisation and increased shareholder value.

Pros and cons

The jury is still out as to the reliability of the Scorecard as it has yet
to be implemented widely. It has been hailed as a straightforward process, but
one HR manager in the US complained that she had trudged her way through the
book trying to get to grips with the various models but found it far too
scientific and inhuman.

HR consultant Paul Kearns says the Scorecard risks inflicting a complicated
solution on a relatively simple problem. He writes off the case study material
as unintelligible to anyone without a degree in astro-HR and, ultimately,
unconvincing.

"It is academics going berserk trying to analyse things to the nth
degree," he says.

As with many initiatives that cover the entire organisation, the success of
the HR Scorecard depends on support from the top. If that is absent, the
attempts to progress are likely to flounder – something Dr Kaplan acknowledges.

At the very least, the Scorecard could be a catalyst for useful
brainstorming, although organisations will have to make sure they avoid the
trap of lots of thinking but little action.

Who’s on board

Most large organisations – including Nat West – tried the Balanced Scorecard
with varying degrees of success and failure.

But it is still early days for the HR Scorecard. Although the HR Scorecard
book’s back cover is peppered with accolades from academics and senior HR
people from a range of organisations, including Dell Computer Corporation and
Hewlett-Packard, apart from telecommunications firm Verizon it is unclear
which, if any, have gone down the route.

Verdict

We have yet to see whether the HR Scorecard is just another fad along the
lines of TQM (Total Quality Management) or BPR (Business Process
Reengineering).

Dr Kaplan insists it is not, pointing out that use of its predecessor is
still on the increase.

Kearns, on the other hand, says, "There is nothing new under the sun.
The Scorecard approach is about putting in place a continuous improvement
system so it is just another spin-off to TQM. It will attract HR teams that
don’t really want to make a difference but want to look as if they do. It’s all
smoke and mirrors."

The HR Scorecard seems likely to generate some excitement in the HR world
with its golden promise of tying HR activity into the bottom line. It does have
the backing of respected academics and, if it attracts the attention its
predecessor did, it might just be the next Big Thing.

Fact file

Key players

Robert Kaplan, professor of accounting and control at Harvard Business
School, and David Norton, co founder of IT firm Nolan Norton & Co. The duo
jointly developed the Balanced Scorecard.

Also involved are Mark Huselid, Brian Becker and Dave Ulrich, of the
University of Michigan.

HR contribution

The role of the HR professional is key in the HR Scorecard process. The head
of the HR department should be the "primary sponsor" responsible for
assigning a task force to the initiative and making sure the Scorecard is on
the right track according to the existing business strategy.

Essential reading

The HR Scorecard: Linking People, Strategy and Performance (2001)

Brian Becker, Mark Huselid and Dave Ulrich, published by Harvard Business
School Press

The Human Resources Scorecard:Measuring the return on investment

Jack JPhilips, Ron DStone, Patricia Pulliam Phillips, published by
Butterworth Heinemann

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The Balanced Scorecard – Translating Strategy into Action (1996), published
by Harvard Business School Press

What’s Wrong with the HR Scorecard: A NASA Ballpoint Pen, by Paul Kearns. www.hr.com

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Employers exaggerate compensation culture, claims TUC
next post
HR plays major role in Ulster police overhaul

You may also like

Forward features list 2025 – submitting content to...

23 Nov 2024

Features list 2021 – submitting content to Personnel...

1 Sep 2020

Large firms have no plans to bring all...

26 Aug 2020

A typical work-from-home lunch: crisps

24 Aug 2020

Occupational health on the coronavirus frontline – ‘I...

21 Aug 2020

Occupational Health & Wellbeing research round-up: August 2020

7 Aug 2020

Acas: Redundancy related enquiries surge 160%

5 Aug 2020

Coronavirus: lockdown ‘phase two’ may bring added headaches...

17 Jul 2020

Unemployment to top 4 million as workers come...

15 Jul 2020

Over 1,000 UK redundancies expected at G4S Cash...

14 Jul 2020

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+