Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Employment law

The price for injured feelings just got higher

by Alex Lock 8 Oct 2009
by Alex Lock 8 Oct 2009

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has increased the bands of damages that can be awarded for injury to feelings in discrimination cases. While all anti-discrimination legislation provides for awards for injury to feelings – the Equal Pay Act excepted – the legislation does not provide guidance on how such awards should be calculated.

Bands

In 2002, guidance was provided by the Court of Appeal in the case of Vento v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police. Three bands were set for potential awards, and for some time afterwards tribunals and courts stuck to these Vento bands when making awards for injury to feelings.

However, differences of approach then emerged. Case law requires that tribunals take account of the value of the sum in every-day life when making an award, and generally tribunals make such awards as they think just and equitable. It is not then surprising that some tribunals increased the upper limits of the Vento Bands to take account of inflation. Other tribunals declined to do so until higher courts made a ruling. Only the courts could increase the upper limits because the Vento Bands were a case law development – not set by statute or regulation.

Now the EAT has increased the Vento Bands, tribunals will once again approach awards for injury to feelings with consistency.

Compensation

So, how much can a successful claimant expect to get by way of an award for injury to feelings? The award is compensatory, not punitive, and is not dependent on financial loss. The claimant must show how much his/her feelings have been injured. Account is taken of the claimant’s vulnerability, personal characteristics, any connected medical condition, effect on him/her, the nature of the job, and how the respondent dealt with any grievance.

In 2008, across all discrimination strands, the average injury to feelings award was £6,612, 58% of awards fell into the low Vento band, and 36% in the middle.

Some £4,500 was awarded to a solicitor refused part-time working for childcare reasons – tribunals take account of awards for personal injury, and her hurt was compared to a minor leg/arm injury. A Polish man walked for an hour to a job interview but was refused work because he might return to Poland. He was awarded £1,000 as his feelings were not judged to be severely injured because he later applied for another job with the same employer.

So how can employers avoid cases arising, and best handle allegations of discrimination to avoid cases escalating?

A robustly implemented policy sets standards and warns employees that discriminatory behaviour won’t be tolerated. Training raises awareness, develops skills and promotes understanding that diversity issues have a wide-ranging impact in the business including handling performance, discipline and sickness and in social interactions.

A procedure gives a route by which complaints can be raised. Investigate allegations of discrimination promptly and thoroughly. If it’s possible to restore working relationships, then cases are contained, and the risk of claims minimised.

injury to feelings awards

Band Case type Vento New

bands maximum

Lower Less serious – £500 to £6,000

involving isolated £5,000

or one-off events

Middle Serious – £5,000 to £18,000

not meriting an £15,000

award in higher

band

Upper Most serious – £15,000 to £30,000

where there has £25,000

been a lengthy

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

harassment

campaign

Alex Lock

previous post
Scottish energy firm to create 250 jobs
next post
Postal strike ballot result due later today

You may also like

EHRC acts on policies flouting law on single-sex...

28 Aug 2025

Acas to explore use of AI as half...

27 Aug 2025

Royal Mail eCourier drivers bring legal claim over...

26 Aug 2025

Lidl enters agreement with EHRC to prevent sexual...

22 Aug 2025

X settles severance claims of former Twitter employees

22 Aug 2025

Midwife files belief claim after Trust reported social...

20 Aug 2025

Personnel Today Awards 2025 shortlist: Employment Law Firm...

20 Aug 2025

Right-to-work crackdown: businesses left without ‘statutory excuse’

5 Aug 2025

TUC says Employment Rights Bill must be delivered...

28 Jul 2025

Neurodiversity case exposes nuance in reasonable adjustments

25 Jul 2025

  • Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain with centred ergonomics SPONSORED | If you often notice...Read more
  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise