Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employment lawInsolvencyTUPE

TUPE and insolvency: EAT considers limited circumstances in which employees do not transfer

by DLA Piper 22 Jan 2014
by DLA Piper 22 Jan 2014

In DLA Piper’s case report, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) examined the TUPE provisions that mean that employees do not automatically transfer where the transferor is “under the supervision of an insolvency practitioner”.

Ward Brothers (Malton) Ltd and others v Middleton EAT/0249/13

Background

This case relates to the special insolvency provisions in the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (TUPE).

Regulation 8(7) of TUPE states that the rules relating to the automatic transfer of employment and protection from transfer-related dismissals do not apply where the transferor is “the subject of bankruptcy proceedings or any analogous insolvency proceedings which have been instituted with a view to the liquidation of the assets of the transferor and are under the supervision of an insolvency practitioner”.

This means that, if rule 8(7) applies, employees do not automatically transfer to a new employer on the sale of an insolvent business and can be dismissed prior to the sale without risk of automatic unfair dismissal claims – although the ordinary rules on unfair dismissal still apply. The purchaser of an insolvent business can also offer employees employment on less favourable terms without the risk that these terms will be void.

Facts

Bulmers, a haulage company, was in financial difficulty. HM Revenue & Customs had issued the company with a winding-up petition and Bulmers ceased trading shortly before the petition was heard. On the next working day after Bulmers ceased to trade, Ward Brothers started to carry out Bulmers’ major contracts, engaging those in Bulmers’ workforce who were willing to work under the less favourable terms offered by Ward Brothers. Insolvency practitioners were advising Bulmers in the week before the company ceased to trade, although administrators were not formally appointed until 10 days after trading ceased.

Ward Brothers argued that Bulmers had been “under the supervision of an insolvency practitioner” and so TUPE did not apply when it took over Bulmers’ contracts.

Decision

The EAT decided that reg.8(7) of TUPE did not apply as the insolvency practitioners had not been formally appointed by Bulmers, nor was Bulmers under their “supervision”. The insolvency practitioners had simply been on site in an advisory capacity.

This meant that TUPE applied when Ward Brothers took over the contracts, and the employees who had refused to accept the less favourable terms offered by Ward Brothers were able to bring claims of automatic unfair dismissal and for protective awards for failure to consult against Ward Brothers. Those employees who had accepted less favourable terms were entitled to have their old Bulmers terms honoured.

Comment

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This case confirms that for any potential buyer of an insolvent business, TUPE is an ever-present risk. Unless insolvency practitioners have been formally appointed before the sale, there can be no realistic argument that TUPE does not apply. Even where administrators have been appointed before a sale, following the decision in Key2Law (Surrey) LLP v De’Antiquis [2012] IRLR 212 CA, the automatic transfer rules in TUPE will be likely to apply unless the insolvency proceedings were instituted with the purpose of liquidating the company’s assets, rather than rescuing the company.

Jane Cotton, legal director, DLA Piper

XpertHR guidance on TUPE
  • How to avoid falling foul of the law on harmonising contractual terms and conditions following a TUPE transfer Practical guidance on the law on harmonising contractual terms and conditions following a TUPE transfer.
  • Weekly dilemma: Administration This dilemma concerns what happens to a company’s employees after it has gone into administration.
  • Transfer of undertakings: the basics A summary of the law on transfer of undertakings, including the meaning of “relevant transfer”, the effect of a relevant transfer on contracts of employment and pension arrangements and dismissal because of a relevant transfer.
DLA Piper

previous post
Accommodating employees’ religious beliefs – should employers follow M&S’s example?
next post
Five ways to get line managers talking

You may also like

Fire and rehire: the relocation question

22 May 2025

Minister defends Employment Rights Bill at Acas conference

16 May 2025

CBI chair Soames accuses ministers of not listening...

16 May 2025

EHRC bows to pressure and extends gender consultation

15 May 2025

Contract cleaner loses EAT race discrimination appeal

14 May 2025

Construction workers win compensation claim against defunct employer

9 May 2025

Zero-hours workers’ rights to be extended from beyond...

8 May 2025

Employment tribunal backlog up 23% in a year

7 May 2025

Ministers urged to outlaw misuse of NDAs

7 May 2025

Employment Rights Bill must be tightened to protect...

1 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+