Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Learning & developmentUK Commission for Employment & SkillsOpinion

UK skills reform must make system fit for purpose

by Personnel Today 10 Sep 2009
by Personnel Today 10 Sep 2009

As all employers know, restructuring a large organisation is a time-consuming and stressful business. It inevitably creates uncertainty, and unexpected problems arise.

For that reason, many businesses will have been less than overjoyed to hear of another proposed change to the structure of skills funding bodies – a system already in need of stability and simplification.

Such changes have been happening with particular frequency in this area of government. The Learning and Skills Council (LSC) is being abolished next year after less than 10 years in existence, to be replaced by three new organisations. Meanwhile the Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills itself lasted less than two years before being merged with the business department to create the Department for Business Innovation and Skills (BIS).

Now it seems the Skills Funding Agency (SFA), one of the LSC’s successor bodies, is being reformed before it has even been launched. It was reported recently that further changes are in the pipeline as consideration is being given to devolving responsibility for drawing up skills strategies to Regional Development Agencies. These would then be implemented by the new skills agency, whereas previously it had been understood that sector skills councils would take the lead on such strategies, with the SFA acting as a light-touch funding body.

While this latest intervention was unexpected, the debate over whether skills policy and funding should be set on a regional or sector-specific basis is certainly one worth having. There are arguments on both sides, but as a manufacturing organisation it has always been our view that it makes more sense to look at specific sectors of industry, rather than regional geography.

There may be some types of industry that are defined principally by their region, but most manufacturing companies will be characterised much more strongly by the sector in which they operate. Aerospace production has its own distinct problems â€“ for example, whether companies are based in Belfast or Cambridge â€“ and shortages of key skills will tend to affect an industrial sector as a whole. To put it another way, the ‘what’ is more important than the ‘where’.

The more fundamental question, however, is what having another set of reforms is seeking to achieve. Are we still on the road to a more demand-led system of funding for skills, as mapped out in the Leitch Review? Or is thinking now moving more towards regional determination of skills needs and planning of training provision?

We hope that the answers to such questions will be informed by responses to the latest consultation by the UK Commission for Employment and Skills. The commission made simplification of the skills system an early priority for its work, and produced a report last year on the issue which made a lot of sensible points. It has just finished a consultation on the next steps.

The backdrop to all of this is the parlous state of public finances. We can’t assume that skills funding will be maintained at levels seen in recent years. Getting any further reforms right could direct more of the money to training rather than supporting a complex bureaucracy.

This latest intervention from BIS looks set to spark renewed debate on these issues, and we can expect some interesting responses from sector skills councils, which are likely to be the biggest losers from the proposed reorganisation.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Agreement on the right skills infrastructure to meet the UK’s growing demand for higher-level skills has been a long time coming. By all means let’s have that debate â€“ but let’s make sure that whatever the outcome, the system stands at least some chance of surviving an election and being fit for purpose for more than a couple of years.

Lee Hopley, head of skills policy, EEF

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Local government 1.25% pay deal accepted
next post
Pontin’s in Blackpool to close but holiday park jobs created elsewhere

You may also like

Culture, ‘micro-incivilities’ and invisible talent

14 May 2025

Investing in skills when budgets are tight

12 May 2025

Rethinking talent: Who was never considered in the...

7 May 2025

Eight ways to best support grieving employees

6 May 2025

Leading with honest feedback: A responsibility in recruitment

24 Apr 2025

High-level apprenticeship spend doubles in five years

16 Apr 2025

Exploring the best London office locations for ‘Zillennials’

16 Apr 2025

Number of SMEs hiring staff in decline

10 Apr 2025

Gen Z and ‘conscious unbossing’: how can HR...

7 Apr 2025

How to build a commercially-minded workforce

3 Apr 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+