Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Latest News

Union claims partial victory in DWP bonus scheme dispute

by Michael Millar 17 Dec 2004
by Michael Millar 17 Dec 2004

The Public and Commercial Services Union (PCS) has claimed a partial victory in its high court action with the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) over its disputed new bonus system.

The argument, which has already resulted in six days of strike action in 2004, centres on the Performance Development System (PDS). The union claims that under the system at least 50 per cent of staff will be rated as poor, irrespective of their individual performance.

If too many employees are given the higher performance marking then they will be compared against each other to reduce the number of staff to the predetermined level (this is called relative assessment), the union said.

The PCS claims this amounts to a breach of contract for staff working in Jobcentres, benefits, child support agencies and the pension service.

Following the High Court decision, grievance procedures will apply to the appraisal scheme and employees will now be allowed to appeal retrospectively against their 2004 PDS box markings.

However the High Court ruled that the introduction of relative assessment quotas as part of the PDS in the DWP was not a breach of contract.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Mark Serwotka, PCS general secretary, said: “The decision of the High Court in no way changes the deeply unpopular nature of PDS, which has seen 97 per cent of staff voting against the system.

“The level of dissatisfaction with PDS means that whatever the decision today, PDS must be radically reformed if it is to gain the confidence of staff,” he said.

Michael Millar

previous post
CIPD warns of pressure in jobs market
next post
Profitability is linked to employee engagement

You may also like

MPs reject Lords’ amendments to Employment Rights Bill

16 Sep 2025

Failure to prevent fraud: Only 29% training staff...

16 Sep 2025

Scottish government funds furlough for bus manufacturer

16 Sep 2025

Which employers offer equal parental leave?

16 Sep 2025

Google to create 8,250 AI jobs as part...

16 Sep 2025

‘The spotlight on AI skills risks creating an...

16 Sep 2025

Jobs market continuing to stagnate, says official data

16 Sep 2025

Call for a national OH service to tackle...

16 Sep 2025

Right to request flexible working has had limited...

16 Sep 2025

Staff prioritise work-life balance and boundaries – research

16 Sep 2025

  • Workplace health benefits need to be simplified SPONSORED | Long-term sickness...Read more
  • Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain with centred ergonomics SPONSORED | If you often notice...Read more
  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits Live
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise