Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Equality, diversity and inclusionEqual pay

Weekly dilemma: Equal pay

by Personnel Today 18 Apr 2006
by Personnel Today 18 Apr 2006

Q. We have a number of employees expressing concern about pay disparities between themselves and their peers of equivalent abilities and performance levels, where length of service is equal. Can an organisation be held liable for these disparities, and how should we address this problem?

A. Generally speaking, it is for the employer and individual employees to agree a salary paid under a contract of employment. Therefore, an employer is free to pay different staff at different rates. The exception is where there is a difference in pay between members of the opposite sex employed in:



  • like work
  • work rated as equivalent
  • work of equal value.

This is contrary to the Equal Pay Act 1970, and a tribunal could hold an employer liable.

Pursuing a claim

The employee must identify a comparator who is paid more for the same work. A female must choose a male comparator and vice-versa. An employee cannot bring an equal pay claim using a comparator of the same sex â€“ pay discrepancies between members of the same sex are morally unfair at worst, but it is generally quite lawful.

Dealing with disparities

If an employer is faced with an equal pay claim, it is a defence to show that the difference in pay is due to a genuine material factor â€“ for example, additional qualifications or experience.

To prevent claims, employers are encouraged to carry out regular pay reviews to monitor how their pay and benefit schemes operate, and the effect such schemes have on staff of a particular sex.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

If pay inequalities are discovered as part of the review, the employer should take reasonable steps to remove them and/or to assure that those differences relate to something other than gender. It should also make sure that its pay system is as transparent as possible. If employees understand the basis for salaries and other benefits, and can see them applied in practice, they will be less likely to bring claims.

Sue Nickson, partner and international head of employment, Hammonds


Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Legal Q&A: Bird flu pandemic
next post
Aberdeen council to spend £15m in equal pay settlements

You may also like

Data bias means gender pay gap wider than...

26 Aug 2025

Council defends suggested alternatives to ‘husband’ and ‘wife’

21 Aug 2025

Could equal pay questionnaires be revived?

19 Aug 2025

British Transport Police first force to hire part-time...

19 Aug 2025

Eurostar’s Georgie Willis a keynote speaker at Employee...

19 Aug 2025

Worker awarded £3,000 for ‘Slave’ graffiti employer had...

7 Aug 2025

EU pay transparency rules driving ‘cultural pay shift’...

7 Aug 2025

Civil Service launches drive to attract interns from...

1 Aug 2025

Why LGBTQ+ is not one big, happy acronym

25 Jul 2025

MPs ‘openly hostile’ to preferred choice for EHRC...

24 Jul 2025

  • Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain with centred ergonomics SPONSORED | If you often notice...Read more
  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise