This award looked for training interventions that have significantly benefited a business or organisation, particularly if the trainers involved developed new approaches. The judge wanted to see evidence of improved performance and gains in employee skills and capabilities. Entrants showed how training boosted motivation and helped focus staff on key organisational objectives. The judge looked for well-designed training programmes that have been delivered successfully.
The judge
Hugh Murray FCIPD is a co-director and co-founder of Scott Bradbury, which provides training and learning materials, principally DVDs, to businesses. Previously he was managing director of training and learning supplies company Fenman, which he founded in 1987. His recent DVDs include Improving Attendance and Using Competencies Successfully. He is also a well-known speaker on the learning and development circuit.
The shortlisted teams:
Kier Group
The team: Group training and development
Number in team: 20
Number of people in organisation: 9,000
About the organisation
Kier is a construction, development and service company that specialises in building and civil engineering, support services, private house building, property development and Private Finance Initiatives.
The challenge
To develop more managers internally, cut recruitment costs and staff turnover, and develop effective succession planning. Also, to improve levels of professionalism among staff and improve safety on project work, and offer proof of workforce competence to customers. In short, a talent/career development programme was needed.
What the organisation did
It introduced a career development programme, based on company and industry competencies, with development paths for all staff from new entrants to directors. This included entry schemes for trainees from apprentice to graduate levels, accredited by external colleges and professional bodies, as well as:
Benefits and achievements
The judge says: "Talent management - growth and retention - was the challenge faced by this construction and civil engineering group. A wide-ranging and imaginative training programme enabled it to double the number of internal promotions and to double the number of directors promoted from within."
Aramark Ltd
The team: Operational Excellence (OE)
Number in team: 11
Number of people in organisation: 12,800 in the UK
About the organisation
Aramark is a catering and facilities management company and includes business dining, employee restaurants, retail facilities and coffee outlets throughout the UK.
The challenge
Its major challenge was to raise performance in the delivery of contracts in an increasingly competitive market. In particular, it wanted to improve the skills, attitudes and performance of unit managers and to meet higher levels of profitability. The company wanted all unit managers to work to a common standard using a standardised food production methodology, and to take responsibility for the performance of their unit.
What the organisation did
It developed a variety of learning methods through the Operational Excellence programme. These included:
Benefits and achievements
The judge says: "This contract caterer increased profit in one division from £3.3m to £15.7m by means of an initiative that included training unit managers to take responsibility for the financial performance of their units."
Ealing Homes Ltd
The team: HR
Number in team: 9
Number of people in organisation: 310
About the organisation
Ealing Homes Ltd (EHL) is an arm's-length management organisation, which manages almost 19,000 properties for the London Borough of Ealing.
The challenge
There was insufficient staff engagement, and an audit of skills and competencies was needed. Customer satisfaction also had to be raised to meet the Audit Commission's 'excellent' rating. Consequently, staff involvement and accountability needed to improve, and they needed to become aware of the positive difference that personal development could make to the business.
What the organisation did
Benefits and achievements
The judge says: "EHL found the workforce was disengaged and there was insufficient customer satisfaction. The challenge was to achieve an 'excellent' Audit Commission rating, and they provided evidence that they are well on track to achieve it."
B&Q
The team: Retail learning and development
Number in team: 22
Number of people in organisation: 38.000
About the organisation
B&Q is a major DIY and home improvement retail chain.
The challenge
B&Q faces a strong and continuing challenge from rivals. It decided to improve the advice service that its staff offer customers, which it calls its First and Only proposition. Above all, it wanted to give staff the ability to give customers the advice and confidence they needed to carry out home improvement projects. Staff also had to gain the ability and confidence to educate other staff and customers through product and skills demonstrations.
What the organisation did
Benefits and achievements
The judge says: "Their challenge was to increase sales by increasing the product knowledge of their staff. They undertook an imaginative programme in which staff undertook projects using the tools and materials sold by B&Q. They achieved a measured improvement of 7.37% in sales revenues as a result."
Boots UK Ltd
The team: Healthcare learning and development
Number in team: 40
Number of people in organisation: 70,000
About the organisation
Boots is a high street pharmacy, healthcare and beauty chain. The entry concerns Alliance Pharmacy (AP), part of the Boots organisation, which has 920 stores in the UK.
The challenge
In 2005, the government started to contract and fund pharmacies to conduct in-store customer consultations and offer advice on the correct use of prescribed and over-the-counter medicines. AP called this activity Medicines Check-Ups (MCUs), which it implemented in most of its stores. It soon become clear that some were performing better than others, and AP wanted to identify and improve under-performing outlets. After some research, it concluded that the challenge it faced was "rooted in staff psychology". Some believed they were too busy to fit MCUs into their working day, while others feared adverse customer and GP reactions to the service.
What the organisation did
On a budget of £123 per store:
Benefits and achievements
The judge says: "Their challenge was to increase the number of consultations carried out in-store by their pharmacists by 20%. Their training intervention produced an uplift far in excess of this target, a substantial return on investment, and considerable benefits to the company and to the public."
Subscribe to our free e-newsletters