Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employment lawData protectionLatest NewsRecruitment & retentionSelection interviews

Information Commissioner’s ruling could open doors to claims from failed job candidates

by John Charlton 22 Jan 2009
by John Charlton 22 Jan 2009

Job candidates may be allowed to see other applicants’ details, including interview notes, following a decision by the Information Commissioner (IC) against Leicester City Council.

The IC ruled that a council employee, who had applied for two internal vacancies, had the right, under the Freedom of Information (FoI) Act, to see various details of other candidates as long as their identities were kept secret. The complainant had his request for information about the recruitment process and other candidates turned down by the council.

It said it could refuse the request on the grounds of an exemption as detailed in section 40 of the FoI Act.

But the IC decided that the exemption applied to some of the details in a job application, but not to all of it.

“Some of the information about applicants’ experience and qualifications could be provided in an anonymised form, without breaching their rights under the Data Protection Act 1998.”

The IC has told Leicester City Council to provide the information requested “either by redacting (editing) the application forms so that all information from which a candidate could be identified was removed, or by supplying brief summaries of applicants’ experience and qualifications.”

Rebecca Fox, employment solicitor at Matthew Arnold & Baldwin, said the judgment “should be viewed with importance by employers”.

“This decision states that the information from interviews, and the interview selection process, should be readily available to applicants, save for any identifying personal details. This means that employers need to be careful not to put anything in their notes about applicants that could give rise to a claim in the employment tribunal. For example, any comments about the applicant’s suitability for a position due to their age, sex, race, religion or any disability could see the employer facing a claim for discrimination.

“Awards for successful claimants in discrimination claims are uncapped. It is, therefore, important that any criteria for assessing applicants is fair and non-discriminatory. Employers should ensure that any notes made in interviews are suitable to be shown to the unsuccessful applicants after the event.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

“Employers should remember that it is important to take detailed notes during the interview process in case there is any claim made by unsuccessful applicants to justify the [organisation’s] appointment of the successful candidate and this case should not be seen as a deterrent to the note taking process.”

[Headline edited in light of comment from Will (below) on 23 Jan 2009, 12:46pm]

John Charlton

previous post
The most important part of learning & development – transferring the learning
next post
New flu pandemic guide for GPs

You may also like

Employers bemoan Gen Z’s lack of ‘work readiness’...

24 Jun 2025

HR underprepared for likely increase in M&A activity

24 Jun 2025

Supporting employees through substance abuse

24 Jun 2025

Amazon invests £40bn in UK creating thousands of...

24 Jun 2025

With HR absence rising, is your people team...

24 Jun 2025

Level 7 apprenticeship funding cuts to cost employers...

23 Jun 2025

Skills receive £1.2bn boost in new industrial strategy

23 Jun 2025

Low-paid could receive ‘Britannia’ dividend under Reform’s non-dom...

23 Jun 2025

Man who used company credit card for himself...

23 Jun 2025

UK engineering and manufacturing firms face hiring struggles

23 Jun 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+